Return-Path: 
 <users-return-3066-apmail-trafficserver-users-archive=trafficserver.apache.org@trafficserver.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF0B410D7F
	for <apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Sat, 10 Aug 2013 15:15:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 85352 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2013 15:15:06 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@trafficserver.apache.org
Received: (qmail 85309 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2013 15:15:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@trafficserver.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@trafficserver.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@trafficserver.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@trafficserver.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.trafficserver.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@trafficserver.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@trafficserver.apache.org
Received: (qmail 85301 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2013 15:15:06 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 15:15:05 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of h.reindl@thelounge.net
 designates 91.118.73.15 as permitted sender)
Received: from [91.118.73.15] (HELO mail.thelounge.net) (91.118.73.15)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 15:15:01 +0000
Received: from srv-rhsoft.rhsoft.net (openvpn-rh.thelounge.net [10.0.0.241])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.thelounge.net (THELOUNGE MTA) with ESMTPSA id 3cC6LR6fPZz2h
	for <users@trafficserver.apache.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 17:14:39 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <520658DF.7010402@thelounge.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 17:14:39 +0200
From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
Organization: the lounge interactive design
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130805 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@trafficserver.apache.org
Subject: Re: 3.3.5: performance regression?
References: <52063E61.8090201@thelounge.net>
 <153920A9-F441-4991-8034-A2D9DAB46FF0@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <153920A9-F441-4991-8034-A2D9DAB46FF0@apache.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
OpenPGP: id=7F780279;
	url=http://arrakis.thelounge.net/gpg/h.reindl_thelounge.net.pub.txt
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="STk5KImLMtUdipmW1kIMpxWT359WVPXq4"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--STk5KImLMtUdipmW1kIMpxWT359WVPXq4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Am 10.08.2013 16:46, schrieb Leif Hedstrom:
> On Aug 10, 2013, at 7:21 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> wro=
te:
>=20
>> has anybody compared 3.2 / 3.3 in performance?
>>
>> ab -c 200 -n 100000 http://<url>/rte/upload/logo.gif while "logo.gif" =
is
>> 643 bytes small and currently httpd without Trafficserver in front has=

>> nearly the same perfomrance with even lower CPU
>=20
> I haven't seen this behavior. Are you positive the 3.3.5 results are ca=
che hits ? And if so, that they become RAM cache hits? Just trying to get=
 some ideas here =85 :)

i hope so, if not that would be a bug

[root@testserver:~]$ curl --head http://rhsoft.testserver/rte/upload/logo=
=2Egif
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 15:09:31 GMT
Last-Modified: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10:40:40 GMT
ETag: "283-411255ab33a00"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 643
Cache-Control: max-age=3D60
Expires: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 15:10:31 GMT
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Connection: close
Content-Type: image/gif

on the origin mod_expires is in action to set 60 seconds
cache for images because in our case we have 100% dynamic
pages and the job of ATS is only hold back the image/css/js
requests from the preforking apache and offer KeepAlive

the 60 seconds are reflected in the curl-repsonse abvove
which comes from the origin (127.0.0.1:80)

<IfModule mod_expires.c>
 ExpiresActive On
 ExpiresByType image/jpeg A60
 ExpiresByType image/jpg A60
 ExpiresByType image/gif A60
 ExpiresByType image/png A60
 ExpiresByType text/css A60
 ExpiresByType text/html A60
 ExpiresByType text/javascript A60
 ExpiresByType text/comma-separated-values A60
 ExpiresByType text/tab-separated-values A60
 ExpiresByType application/javascript A60
 ExpiresByType application/x-javascript A60
 ExpiresByType application/xhtml+xml A60
 ExpiresByType application/xml A60
<IfModule/>


> Reclaimable freelist would not have these sort of performance discrepan=
cies

yes, and it should not matter in a (ok small) cache with only a handful o=
f objects


--STk5KImLMtUdipmW1kIMpxWT359WVPXq4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlIGWN8ACgkQhmBjz394AnmMAwCfelG+gTqrNzTUfhAxPEWv/NC7
BE0AoJVTHpj4Dwxv/paDR7kxYFh60uJ8
=ejcB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--STk5KImLMtUdipmW1kIMpxWT359WVPXq4--