----- Original Message -----
> On Aug 12, 2013, at 3:30 PM, Igor Galić <i.galic@brainsware.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >> I don't think that a fast release cycle can work without strong
> >> compatibility
> >> guarantee. Who wants to deal with upgrade issues 3 or 4 times a year? The
> >> only way everyone will feel comfortable upgrading is if it a no-brainer
> >> and always works.
> >
> > this ^
>
> I'm not sure how we've ended up in this discussion, the above is a given, has
> always been, always will be, and was never disputed.
>
> 1) We have never, ever broken compatibility within a major release. At least
> not intentionally, I think we reverted one such change once?
>
> 2) The Wiki proposal as it was written would never, ever allow you to break
> compatibility within the major release.
I am fully aware of these things. I have merely singled out what
James said — quoting him out of context — because I liked what he
said *generally* - sorry Did not mean to cause Internet Drama!
--
Igor Galić
Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE
|