Mailing-List: contact users-help@trafficserver.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@trafficserver.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of luca.rea@contactlab.com
 designates 93.94.35.252 as permitted sender)
From: Luca Rea <luca.rea@contactlab.com>
To: "'users@trafficserver.apache.org'" <users@trafficserver.apache.org>
Subject: R: [SUGGESTIONS] s/-unstable/-dev/ for 3.3.x release cycle
Thread-Topic: [SUGGESTIONS] s/-unstable/-dev/ for 3.3.x release cycle
Thread-Index: AQHNRa0VmJNjKs3xNUicDZHjDsOH7pbw0o6l
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 19:43:19 +0000
Message-ID: <954D23549BF60D4488191378EE57420B024D651A@BEAR.tomatowin.local>
In-Reply-To: <4FD25284.3020304@apache.org>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

I think many users look at dev release just like to a fixed and working fin=
e release under development for adding more great features to be tested, no=
t an unstable one with declared bugs.


Luca Rea

Reparto IT
System engineer
__________________________________

ContactLab s.r.l.
Via Natale Battaglia 12
20127 Milano
Tel. +39.02.283118.1
Fax. +39.02.70030269
http://www.contactlab.com
__________________________________

E-mail & E-marketing Evolution


----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: Leif Hedstrom [mailto:zwoop@apache.org]
Inviato: Friday, June 08, 2012 09:29 PM=0A=
A: dev@trafficserver.apache.org <dev@trafficserver.apache.org>; 'users@traf=
ficserver.apache.org' <users@trafficserver.apache.org>
Oggetto: [SUGGESTIONS] s/-unstable/-dev/ for 3.3.x release cycle

I'd like to suggest that starting with v3.3.0, we make our development=20
releases named e.g.

     trafficserver-3.3.0-dev


Any objections? The reason is that "unstable" has bad connotation in the=20
communities in general, and corporations in particular. And we really=20
want people to have the guts to try our dev releases, even though they=20
can sometimes be a bit risky.

-- Leif