I think many users look at dev release just like to a fixed and working fine release under
development for adding more great features to be tested, not an unstable one with declared
bugs.
Luca Rea
Reparto IT
System engineer
__________________________________
ContactLab s.r.l.
Via Natale Battaglia 12
20127 Milano
Tel. +39.02.283118.1
Fax. +39.02.70030269
http://www.contactlab.com
__________________________________
E-mail & E-marketing Evolution
----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: Leif Hedstrom [mailto:zwoop@apache.org]
Inviato: Friday, June 08, 2012 09:29 PM
A: dev@trafficserver.apache.org <dev@trafficserver.apache.org>; 'users@trafficserver.apache.org'
<users@trafficserver.apache.org>
Oggetto: [SUGGESTIONS] s/-unstable/-dev/ for 3.3.x release cycle
I'd like to suggest that starting with v3.3.0, we make our development
releases named e.g.
trafficserver-3.3.0-dev
Any objections? The reason is that "unstable" has bad connotation in the
communities in general, and corporations in particular. And we really
want people to have the guts to try our dev releases, even though they
can sometimes be a bit risky.
-- Leif
|