trafficserver-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vaillancourt, Tim" <TVaillanco...@ea.com>
Subject RE: [SUGGESTIONS] s/-unstable/-dev/ for 3.3.x release cycle
Date Fri, 08 Jun 2012 19:47:41 GMT
Good idea, I'm on board. I know I'd have a tough time getting approval on a version with "unstable"
in the name :).

"dev" says everything that needs to be said while causing less uneasiness.

Cheers!

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Luca Rea [mailto:luca.rea@contactlab.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 12:43 PM
To: 'users@trafficserver.apache.org'
Subject: R: [SUGGESTIONS] s/-unstable/-dev/ for 3.3.x release cycle

I think many users look at dev release just like to a fixed and working fine release under
development for adding more great features to be tested, not an unstable one with declared
bugs.






Luca Rea

Reparto IT
System engineer
__________________________________

ContactLab s.r.l.
Via Natale Battaglia 12
20127 Milano
Tel. +39.02.283118.1
Fax. +39.02.70030269
http://www.contactlab.com
__________________________________

E-mail & E-marketing Evolution


----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: Leif Hedstrom [mailto:zwoop@apache.org]
Inviato: Friday, June 08, 2012 09:29 PM
A: dev@trafficserver.apache.org <dev@trafficserver.apache.org>; 'users@trafficserver.apache.org'
<users@trafficserver.apache.org>
Oggetto: [SUGGESTIONS] s/-unstable/-dev/ for 3.3.x release cycle

I'd like to suggest that starting with v3.3.0, we make our development releases named e.g.

     trafficserver-3.3.0-dev


Any objections? The reason is that "unstable" has bad connotation in the communities in general,
and corporations in particular. And we really want people to have the guts to try our dev
releases, even though they can sometimes be a bit risky.

-- Leif



Mime
View raw message