Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD9099E54 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 09:46:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65359 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2012 09:46:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 65323 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2012 09:46:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@trafficserver.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@trafficserver.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 65301 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2012 09:46:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 09:46:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.20.83.52] (HELO gungnir.webthing.com) (209.20.83.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 09:45:59 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.4] (walkham.free-online.co.uk [80.229.52.226]) by gungnir.webthing.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74CE8E8C5C for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 09:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Fwd: 200 responses transformed into 304 Not Modified References: <2E861ADC-747F-4CCC-8624-4BA1BFDDDD57@webthing.com> From: Nick Kew Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: <194E9A22-B435-4BE4-8A22-049C2571294E@apache.org> Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 10:45:36 +0100 To: users@trafficserver.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Bah. Bounced when sent with other "From" address :(=20 Begin forwarded message: > On 9 Apr 2012, at 10:00, Igor Gali=C4=87 wrote: >=20 >> I remember you reported this issue on IRC, and that you were using >> Traffic Server 2.0.1 - please don't do that ;) >> Anyway, did the upgrade to 3.0.x or 3.1.x help you with this? >=20 > I've seen a possibly-related issue with 3.x: trafficserver returns 304 > to an unconditional request. Haven't replied to the OP because it's > not quite the same issue, and I don't have a useful insight on that. >=20 > Provisional Diagnosis: > * Request comes to TS. > * TS has cached copy, but wants to revalidate with origin server. > * TS sends conditional request. > * Origin server correctly replies with 304. > * TS erroneously propagates 304 to client! >=20 > --=20 > Nick Kew