Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33295 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2010 15:52:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Dec 2010 15:52:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 57556 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2010 15:52:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-users-archive@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 57491 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2010 15:52:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@trafficserver.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@trafficserver.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 57483 invoked by uid 99); 30 Dec 2010 15:52:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 15:52:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.200.145.36] (HELO imta-38.everyone.net) (216.200.145.36) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 15:52:07 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (omta005 [127.0.0.1]) by imta-38.everyone.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id oBUFoNR3027667 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 07:51:45 -0800 Received: from dm0000.mta.everyone.net (sj1-slb03-gw2.sj2.proofpoint.com [172.16.1.96]) by imta-38.everyone.net with ESMTP id tgvuar451-1 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 07:51:45 -0800 X-Eon-Dm: dm0201 Received: by dm0201.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2[SSL] - 62d4853b) id dm0201.4d1b7666.17090e for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 07:43:56 -0800 X-Eon-Sig: AQNNi8pNHKi8qGs+TgIAAAAB,36d955192fb6391e574284d4937685b5 Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:43:38 -0600 From: "Alan M. Carroll" Organization: Network Geographics, Inc. X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1228482916.20101230094338@network-geographics.com> To: =?utf-8?B?6a2P5pmL?= Subject: Re: transparent proxy document problems In-Reply-To: References: <182998971.20101229073513@network-geographics.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012300041 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thursday, December 30, 2010, 3:44:00 AM, you wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > Yes, I set up the policy routing, according to the "Inline on Linux > bridge" document, but it did not work. The way the "Inline on a Linux > router" document tells us did not work neither. The ats just can not > accept any request in transparent mode. Are you certain that the client is attached to interface eth1? The treatment of the client side and origin server side interfaces is not symmetric. Does the bridge work without ATS and the ebtables / iptables changes?