On 10/28/2010 05:57 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> Now, I'm thinking that our defensiveness here might be a little bit
> overzealous, so what do you devs say about maybe adding a config
> option that tells ATS to trust the Content-Length header? Or perhaps
> relax the rules around when we don't trust the CL ?
I should point out that there is an API that sets the internal flag for
"trusting" the response CL header, but I have't tested it:
int
INKHttpTxnClientKeepaliveSet(INKHttpTxn txnp)
{
HttpSM *sm = (HttpSM *) txnp;
HttpTransact::State *s = &(sm->t_state);
s->hdr_info.trust_response_cl = true;
return 1;
}
I still think we should examine the possibility of also relaxing the
"hard" rules of never trusting the response CL header, via a
configurable flag (i.e. make it possible to trust some response CL
headers if enabled in records.config).
-- Leif
|