trafficserver-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Anh Le Duc (2)" <anh...@vng.com.vn>
Subject Re: Question about ATS garbage collector
Date Thu, 01 Jun 2017 07:06:14 GMT
Thanks for your thorough explanation. I'm gonna play with the idea. :D

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Alan Carroll <
solidwallofcode@yahoo-inc.com.invalid> wrote:

> Each fragment is part of a specific object. No two objects share a
> fragment.
> I don't think making the fragments contiguous will be of much benefit.
> Either the system is not busy, in which case the additional seek time
> doesn't matter, or it's busy in which case many other objects are being
> read and written simultaneously on the disk and therefore you won't get
> large contiguous reads in any case. Objects are read as they can be written
> to the network, not all at once. Once a socket buffer is full its better to
> read a fragment for another object to fill a different socket buffer.
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 31, 2017, 8:52:08 PM CDT, Anh Le Duc (2) <
> anhld2@vng.com.vn> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Alan.
>
> Does a fragment store only one object?
>
> I understand:
>
> > The difficulty in making fragments for a single object contiguous is the
> data arrives non-contiguously.
>
> Our objects are split and stored into may-be-not-contiguous fragments. Do
> you think it's a good idea to tweak the GC to re-order fragments?
>
>
>
>


-- 

*Anh Le (Mr.)*

*Senior Software Engineer*

*Zalo Technical Dept., Zalo Group, **VNG Corporation*

5th floor, D29 Building, Pham Van Bach Street, Hanoi, Vietnam

*M:* (+84) 987 816 461

*E:* anhld2@vng.com.vn

*W: *www.vng.com.vn
<http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vng.com.vn&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNHYo7I_1mPESzfIvCNjLtAJOq8xsg>

*“Make the Internet change Vietnamese lives”*

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message