Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1EEF200B58 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:29:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id F084C160A90; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A6CC160A6E for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:29:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 96574 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2016 12:29:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@trafficserver.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 96560 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2016 12:29:48 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:29:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 65C63CD517 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:29:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -11.908 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.908 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A2CLG59L0qjD for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 4677261220 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:29:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4014; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1469622587; x=1470832187; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=9WFyM3KY3lSyc26Mj+whr7eve+PiShQ04C3rxkhhgqw=; b=cGJSY78uKu7SQ2gYMLjpkYgUrOiPInQpvMY8grpwSRyOAz3u6Lql4H1J c1yKdd1utPZQk9xTsoqP3EjKG8Y+spWKR8JLNtkIQoKlhjdow8Tk49q8H PeoXCUaqBdJhnnimzfBXwtvJ0W3REIIFfaAytsS6mrxijHGcQ1yExJ/NC s=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AdAgCzp5hX/4UNJK1dgz9WfAasV4cch?= =?us-ascii?q?QWBfSSFeQKBMTgUAQEBAQEBAV0cC4RdAQVzFgIBCAQ7ByERFBECBBOIFwMXDrd?= =?us-ascii?q?VDYQSAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYYqgXiCVYJDhSmCLwWYfTQBhheGM?= =?us-ascii?q?oIygW2EWoh5iCiEBYN3AR42g3huh0J/AQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,429,1464652800"; d="scan'208,217";a="134079798" Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 27 Jul 2016 12:29:46 +0000 Received: from XCH-RTP-008.cisco.com (xch-rtp-008.cisco.com [64.101.220.148]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6RCTj0w027202 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:29:46 GMT Received: from xch-rtp-009.cisco.com (64.101.220.149) by XCH-RTP-008.cisco.com (64.101.220.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 08:29:45 -0400 Received: from xch-rtp-009.cisco.com ([64.101.220.149]) by XCH-RTP-009.cisco.com ([64.101.220.149]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 08:29:45 -0400 From: "Eric Friedrich (efriedri)" To: "dev@trafficserver.apache.org" Subject: Re: Traffic-Control-CDN Thread-Topic: Traffic-Control-CDN Thread-Index: AQHR6AKOjyeLXbNhr0GLaYNHSgtQUg== Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:29:44 +0000 Message-ID: <1FB8FB6C-E4C1-459C-83EE-C1409FD803FE@cisco.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.98.70.99] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1FB8FB6CE4C1459C83EEC1409FD803FEciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 archived-at: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:29:51 -0000 --_000_1FB8FB6CE4C1459C83EEC1409FD803FEciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ahmad- The Google Group https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/traffic_control= is the best forum for asking questions about Traffic Control. If you could= please re-post your question there, the Traffic Control project would be g= lad to answer your questions. Thanks, Eric On Jul 27, 2016, at 2:15 AM, Ahmad Rafiee > wrote: Dear Leif Hedstrom I am a bit confused and I have some question regarding the Traffic Control CDN different release versions. 1.what is the latest stable release now ? 2.we downloaded master git clone and compiled it from source and built our rpms, but there are still some minor issue in our service so i want to know whether they are stable versions or not ? (please note that in the github page the Traffic Control Release 1.5.1 is announced as the latest released versions.what are the state of other new releases? 3.what are the most important differences between 1.5.1 and the new releases (1.6 or 1.7 )? what do we miss if we use 1.5.1 instead of new versions ? 4.would you please clarify about the differences among various branches categories in github ? Sincerely yours, Ahmad Rafiee --_000_1FB8FB6CE4C1459C83EEC1409FD803FEciscocom_--