Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-trafficserver-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0347111943 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82659 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2014 18:49:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-trafficserver-dev-archive@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 82358 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2014 18:49:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@trafficserver.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@trafficserver.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for dev@trafficserver.apache.org Received: (qmail 32183 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2014 17:18:55 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of amit.rodge@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.174 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ukGos2Omqqx4WJU1TwXv99WMacYhm4LfyrV0+cUY3VE=; b=e654iCY8xSERekwoGVlqgFWTMg25WIK1Z/00fU2IXOGFMA1KM6zaz9eT9SrqAJ7hpe uwf0xXdOmwrZcqIKEqUImlST9+8mod0TapJT55LmAsjHS+AbuUKCeH6Dd/QZmUada4J/ VwZFafWXGnD1pW2kooMdMFlP4qGHEYJDxFF+q3WDoayb6CX2cMsa8bvRLqY0XuF/dqW/ Wm/k4rX6rXkBj+7Th8VUELjFHh2IIqPp2+Kumug4ojeGSKJCzz/edAmBatuUaRG/Ehlr Z5mn6mpvrVYcJfwdcXC3pTo2Lwlv21cfiNmM/s8Rjy/TODry/jRJF/jRENEDhJ6Ie3EN 4XPg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.55.40 with SMTP id o8mr11370594igp.42.1397063909028; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 10:18:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 22:48:28 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Question about Raw Disk performance From: Amit Rodge To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b10caa906eb4804f69f4a6d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b10caa906eb4804f69f4a6d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, I am new to ATS. I wanted to check performance of raw disk using ATS for Cache Read and write. As per documentation of ATS, it says raw disk performance is better than formatted disk. I verified page load performance . it degrades page load time with raw disk. During my test, I mentioned path of raw disk partition in storage.config Can anybody help me out that am I missing something here ? Any futher configuration required for to improve the result ? Thanks Amit Rodge -- *The darkest night is just before the dawn.* --047d7b10caa906eb4804f69f4a6d--