+0 on both. I don't think the security issues are significant. But, it doesn't ever hurt
to release.
On Aug 30, 2010, at 4:48 PM, John Plevyak wrote:
>
> +1 for 2.0.1
> +1 for 2.1.2
>
> john
>
>
> On 8/30/2010 1:00 PM, Eric Balsa wrote:
>> +1 for 2.0.1
>> +1 for 2.1.2
>>
>> --Eric
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zwoop@apache.org> wrote:
>>> On 08/26/2010 10:25 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I've prepared a new package for a v2.0.1 release. Please take a look at
>>>> the artifacts, check the STATUS/README/CHANGES files, and do builds and
>>>> tests. After finishing your examination of the release candidate, please
>>>> cast your +/-/0 votes, I will call the vote on 8/30. The src tar-ball and
>>>> signatures are available in
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/rel-candidates/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hmmm, please vote on these releases. If not, I guess the consensus is that
>>> we shouldn't make these releases (then I'll just call it tonight and cancel
>>> the releases).
>>>
>>> If there are concerns about the default for the new setting (to compare the
>>> names on DNS lookups), please voice them and I'll start a new package /
>>> release process (and vote).
>>>
>>> -- leif
>>>
>>>
>
--
Theo Schlossnagle
http://omniti.com/is/theo-schlossnagle
|