Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-trafficserver-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6180 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 02:12:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 02:12:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 74401 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 02:12:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-trafficserver-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 74353 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 02:12:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact trafficserver-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: trafficserver-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list trafficserver-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 74345 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 02:12:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 02:12:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [71.6.165.248] (HELO kramer.ogre.com) (71.6.165.248) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 02:12:35 +0000 Received: from wifi-e-135-242.corp.yahoo.com (nat-dip10.cfw-b-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.145]) (authenticated bits=0) by kramer.ogre.com (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o312CFYh019576 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:12:15 -0700 X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.7.2 kramer.ogre.com o312CFYh019576 X-DomainKeys: Sendmail DomainKeys Filter v1.0.1 kramer.ogre.com o312CFYh019576 Message-Id: <7891C2F0-16FB-4B03-9DD6-1F5522630AA2@apache.org> From: Leif Hedstrom To: trafficserver-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: 2.0.0 release Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:12:14 -0600 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Hi all, I'd like to suggest that we start the 2.0.0 release process on 4/12, and wanted to see what everyone thinks about that. I was going to suggest we wait until after graduation, but I'm not sure I want to wait for that, particularly if there are some details that would prevent us from going to the board with the resolution on 4/21 (which will be a close call anyways :). Thoughts? -- leif P.s Make sure you update and vote on the 2.0.x STATUS file, so we can backport any bugs that must go into the 2.0.0 "final" release.