trafficserver-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Leif Hedstrom (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (TS-63) InkAPI uses INK_EVENT_IMMEDIATE instead of EVENT_CONT just because they are both 1
Date Sat, 17 Apr 2010 04:09:27 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-63?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Leif Hedstrom updated TS-63:
----------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 2.1.0

> InkAPI uses INK_EVENT_IMMEDIATE instead of EVENT_CONT just because they are both 1
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-63
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-63
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: InkAPI
>            Reporter: John Plevyak
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.1.0
>
>
> For some reason the InkAPI and the examples use INK_EVENT_IMMEDIATE as a return value
> when it should be an event argument to handleEvent.  They should be using EVENT_CONT
> which just so happens to also be 1 but is a return value.  it doesn't even make sense
as
> INK_EVENT_IMMEDIATE is used to indicate that an eventProcessor.schedule_imm() 
> has occured (hence the name) while EVENT_CONT indicates that the processor can
> call with more events as compared to EVENT_DONE which indicates that it shouldn't,
> perhaps because the Continuation nolonger exists.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message