From users-return-26646-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@tomee.apache.org Sun May 6 12:12:56 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id A5CDB180674 for ; Sun, 6 May 2018 12:12:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 73551 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2018 10:12:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomee.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@tomee.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomee.apache.org Received: (qmail 73536 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2018 10:12:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openejb-users@openejb.apache.org Received: (qmail 73533 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2018 10:12:53 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 May 2018 10:12:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 57FE01A03CF for ; Sun, 6 May 2018 10:12:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.25 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.25 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RDNS_NONE=3] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FOizdCIzhNuf for ; Sun, 6 May 2018 10:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blaine.gmane.org (unknown [195.159.176.226]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E99465F3F4 for ; Sun, 6 May 2018 10:12:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fFGci-0007pE-BR for users@openejb.apache.org; Sun, 06 May 2018 12:10:32 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: users@openejb.apache.org From: Fredrik Jonson Subject: Re: TomEE Stable and OpenJDK Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 10:10:25 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: <1393459720.5964.1525438580500@amu316.rsint.net> <8229FA89-0A47-4CA4-B570-50A2FB846528__19214.2944936224$1525463237$gmane$org@yahoo.de> X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-18 (Linux) Mark Struberg wrote: > I think what the download page fails to communicate is which EE level > it addresses. > > TomEE-1.7.x adresses the JavaEE 6 specifications, with minimum requirement > Java7 (up to Java8) > TomEE-7.0.x adresses JavaEE 7, with minimum Java7, soon up to Java11 > (7.0.5 in preparation right now) > TomEE-7.1.x (wip) will address JavaEE7 + MicroProfile 1.3 with minimum Java8 > TomEE-8.0.x (wip) will address JavaEE8 + MicroProfile 1.0 with minimum Java8 Thanks for that clarification. It may seem obvious to people in the know, but it is interesting to see a statement on the upper bound of supported JDK/JRE version, as well as the lower bound. In addition to the supported Java EE version range, for the major Tomee versions. Now, just to be explicit here: Apart from EE certification, does the Tomee community consider OpenJDK on equal footing to OracleJDK when it comes to Tomee deployment? Is there any important reason not to recommend OpenJDK over, or at least on par with, OracleJDK? I'm asking because I still encounter a bit of hesitation towards migrating from OracleJDK to OpenJDK. It would be helpful if open source projects such as Tomee made a clear stance on OpenJDK. BTW, I also run Tomee 7.x on OpenJDK 8, and have not found any issues compared to OracleJDK. So, now we know there are more than one application deployed on Tomee and OpenJDK. :) -- Fredrik Jonson