From users-return-26135-apmail-tomee-users-archive=tomee.apache.org@tomee.apache.org Mon Sep 25 22:21:12 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomee-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomee-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDBC010DF0 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 22:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45943 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2017 22:21:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomee-users-archive@tomee.apache.org Received: (qmail 45895 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2017 22:21:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomee.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@tomee.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomee.apache.org Received: (qmail 45883 invoked by uid 99); 25 Sep 2017 22:21:12 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 22:21:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D7ABC182CEA for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 22:21:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.401 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.401 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id At_0Avhdam3a for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 22:21:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com (mail-io0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1438B60D08 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 22:21:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f179.google.com with SMTP id g32so11136242ioj.2 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 15:21:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=O9sCJEB9GiKxcVJpRNFpNg70qroZCj52pbaF+Iep6KE=; b=qXSUer4gwfW5uTX45MuF9gFEPc83sa/r6zh7IPjLjjrtJgDlHBkVkQ7KRtpX89CqVT Jrf7GazpN7v38OlfBY+ZzIfYAO1lFDUu9ny1hKYcXjLhbi/LbCgnKtL4Dn2QyZ9bgB6m U/4PmObdf8gBYGsw/CoqaTuiD0CpqQiDGCnsfy5KqLDngOgjQf8XhxmLwSDmbtRPuXkw 0T2GCyLb/uqSkYVTTXMR/0Re3yNnLjFrVXhk6Q4sjBuVY2rFkRdF/I2XcxL0C+nPeXJx Y1I6j1brPDn3gESS8DxPuoRHzf07/rDNnUL4/qh8cozzjFIfwhnZSEkXpsVW4ROxPeSC 2j8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=O9sCJEB9GiKxcVJpRNFpNg70qroZCj52pbaF+Iep6KE=; b=FjAJwvPEfQx6CMFuiBJmBFj5VeuzLdit0GTtQfFzoJKl7nTtRr0XbQeA4ZJ1InE+sB mx3BK6CMWJUhMaCHWPFOuI3xdD8AtQaTCua4me6f7izk+IprpqktT/FJFXgiWiAtX+Pw HH/yX8NXwiaqBLTR9rxBkAIEiM99cvhfr0rTWe9oscNuUMnJHH6rPCIvfg6lzx4YQrlj ZHx11HDgMcLsWD/lcL0Qnn/2EGy9/agIOKCa2BYclaChJMT+H9ARldBVaLfVw8d2dt83 QlOhjgBkVKwLv1kFEQKZNPUeUtvuUZm7WGtRDgSGa5AE5S1TNIYbFFo1q+jPWNs+sgIA Bteg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUitTLEvuuo8btrEg5fGsyR6QcJFz6WJM5WsmUsDk87zmkNlXvFv QjGa9zMAXa1gCEAionfClMHNfHLAC5cU3WvETHM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QD8WCqLR3SF0kLd49WT1HMILZK8nUXI6qfK9zNYczoY5H++hKQySNy09Xy7U0zIHCu9gwgsxp5B+MHo10PRejw= X-Received: by 10.107.173.34 with SMTP id w34mr11994276ioe.14.1506378062250; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 15:21:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.2.152.219 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 15:20:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1B3AE1B2-677B-4099-AD05-6788AADFC78E@gmail.com> References: <499F1A572C4CF34A9B674264B77551E6011946A3C6@A1GTOEMBXV001.gto.a3c.atos.net> <1B3AE1B2-677B-4099-AD05-6788AADFC78E@gmail.com> From: Danilo Cominotti Marques Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 19:20:41 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: TomEE -Java EE 8 compatible or certified ? To: users@tomee.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114461de4c4917055a0af9d5" --001a114461de4c4917055a0af9d5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, David! Thanks for all the details. However, there is another point that currently worries me: is there any progress on the OpenJPA side of things? By looking at the commits log on GitHub (which should mirror the Apache repository), it doesn't seem like a 3.x release that targets JPA 2.1 will happen anytime soon. Furthermore, the issues targeted at version 3.0.0 in OpenJPA's JIRA seem not to have received any attention for over a year. Therefore, unless I am mistaken about OpenJPA's current condition, I don't see TomEE [non-Plume] implementing all of Java EE 7 soon either, never mind Java EE 8 with JPA 2.2. On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 7:02 PM, David Blevins wrote: > Hi Francois! > > As Mark mentions the Java EE 8 work is going on now. It will be > compatible, but not certified -- at least not directly. > > The story there is the Java EE TCK licensing agreement between Oracle and > Apache expired and is not being renewed due to disagreement on the terms. > So Apache does not have a Java EE 8 TCK. With my Apache hat on, I worked > with Cameron Purdy, then SVP of Development at Oracle, for over 2 years > trying to get a new agreement made. When he departed Oracle, the progress > stopped on the Oracle side. > > I then switched hats and began pursing things from the Tomitribe. After a > year we have licensed and paid for a TCK. We can't legally give it to > Apache (Oracle's rules) nor can we legally release Apache TomEE (Apache's > rules), but we can legally certify something that is 100% Apache TomEE, but > with a different name. I.e. we can take TomEE zip, rename it, run it > through the TCK and put it up. We intend to do that so that Apache TomEE > releases are in spirit, certified. > > There are some challenges ahead, such as only Tomitribe people can run the > TCK or see the results. Java EE itself is being open sourced, TCKs and > all, so this will have a better solution long-term. Short-term we'll have > to power through together as a community and support each other the best we > can. > > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Sep 25, 2017, at 8:15 AM, COURTAULT Francois < > Francois.COURTAULT@gemalto.com> wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > As Java EE 8 is out, could you tell us when a TomEE version will be at > least compatible or certified released ? > > Any pointer to TomEE roadmap ? (Maybe an announcement at Oracle Java One > ?) > > Have to wait for TomEE 9 because of Servlet 4.0 ? > > > > Best Regards. > > > > ________________________________ > > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees > and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or > disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. > > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable > for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the > intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. > > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission > free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a > transmitted virus. > > --001a114461de4c4917055a0af9d5--