From users-return-14061-apmail-tomee-users-archive=tomee.apache.org@tomee.apache.org Wed Oct 30 11:35:20 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomee-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomee-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6D5F10A35 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14079 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2013 11:35:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomee-users-archive@tomee.apache.org Received: (qmail 13789 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2013 11:35:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomee.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@tomee.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomee.apache.org Received: (qmail 13752 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2013 11:35:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:35:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rmannibucau@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.180] (HELO mail-vc0-f180.google.com) (209.85.220.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:35:09 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id lc6so794880vcb.39 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 04:34:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ski7LotMbwh4pTigBqHX7nXxUxY0ZjlGpqgMWLkAI34=; b=U7Ji6rkZsKvx0DFxd2Ke+fpZtIQ5ob0z2Ctk0hsMSwXBye16+Q6+gRpakoaiS0OVU6 bAB8Zr6rt1fRVoHYC6xWdCl+331ZUJ+EyIxWWi6S0nvf3LjT1wy/2fctDTUalYzrFO+H 9PkcNO5SFWm7BINdnO2wt+//drf2oNrNy7/0ISFdtC1abHCm45C8ZRer2jHggA9qFy2I TWwEE4Kznwt/dYl2FpYv+9fC9XQ5wuayyzDjIo09tTNeLRdmiP9jC3mwP5gRgdU1phMX f00uj4vH3f72zOTVtCBzYiTdArkw2brhBtG+ueklEYAqVXlPDGmzdDk1r0f9o92JCTdW uRXw== X-Received: by 10.221.29.200 with SMTP id rz8mr906206vcb.33.1383132888275; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 04:34:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.1.198 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 04:34:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1381222870606-4665447.post@n4.nabble.com> <1383077762.40397.YahooMailNeo@web28903.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> From: Romain Manni-Bucau Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:34:28 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 1.6.0 release plans? To: "users@tomee.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org this has been discussed on a lot of threads, we target 1.6 ATM then see to do a "+1" version (2, 5 maybe 7, still under discussion) but this one will be obviously based on tomcat 8 + the whole apache EE 7 stack Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2013/10/30 Howard W. Smith, Jr. : > interesting response. well, tomcat 8 + myfaces 2.2 + some other component= s > =3D tomee (javaee 7), right? tomcat 8 and myfaces 2.2 have already releas= ed. > > does tomee 1.7 (snapshot) =3D (possible) javaee 7 version/release? > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:46 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > >> When tomee will target javaee 7 >> Le 30 oct. 2013 05:26, "Howard W. Smith, Jr." a >> =E9crit : >> >> > Mark, since you mentioned somewhat of a road map, maybe you, Romain, o= r >> one >> > of the others can tell us when will MyFaces 2.2 be bundled with tomee(= +) >> ? >> > >> > I would love to start using MyFaces 2.2 with tomee, but i don't want t= o >> use >> > that until it is bundled in ZIP file. just a personal preference of mi= ne. >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Mark Struberg >> wrote: >> > >> > > yup, gonna start with cutting the actual release in a few hours. >> > > >> > > The next projects on the list are xbean and OpenWebBeans. >> > > >> > > LieGrue, >> > > strub >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ----- Original Message ----- >> > > > From: Romain Manni-Bucau >> > > > To: "users@tomee.apache.org" >> > > > Cc: >> > > > Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 17:14 >> > > > Subject: Re: 1.6.0 release plans? >> > > > >> > > > Hi >> > > > >> > > > OpenJPA release work started, Jira are almost closed and the relea= se >> > > > should start soon >> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau >> > > > Twitter: @rmannibucau >> > > > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> > > > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> > > > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > 2013/10/29 Alex The Rocker : >> > > >> Hello TomEE team, >> > > >> >> > > >> Would you please update us with TomEE 1.6.0 official release? >> > > >> For example, was the action mentionned by jean-Louis on OpenJPA >> done? >> > > >> When is planned something like an official beta or "release >> > > > candidate" ? >> > > >> >> > > >> Thanks, >> > > >> Alex. >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO >> > > > wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >>> First, push an official mail on OpenJPA mailling list asking fo= r a >> > > > 2.3.0 >> > > >>> release. Waiting an answer within the usual 72 hours for exampl= e. >> > > >>> If no answer or no way to get a release by October 20th or so (= I >> > > > don't >> > > >>> care), then fork it internally as we did sometimes in the past = and >> > > > start >> > > >>> releasing TomEE by end of November. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> That means more or less that we must freeze/finalize all on-goi= ng >> > > >>> development by October the 15th I think. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Thoughts? >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Jean-Louis >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> 2013/10/8 Romain Manni-Bucau >> > > >>> >> > > >>> > Technically yes, then the issue is we need somebody with all >> perms >> > > > to >> > > >>> > release tomee (ping @David?). >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > *Romain Manni-Bucau* >> > > >>> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau * >> > > >>> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >> > > >>> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >> > > >>> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >> > > >>> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > 2013/10/8 Alex The Rocker >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > > @Romain, not sure to understand the details, but do you mea= n >> > > > you may >> > > >>> > have a >> > > >>> > > way to release TomEE+ 1.6.0 official release without waitin= g >> > > > for the >> > > >>> > > (unknown) OpenJPA 2.3.0 release? >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > Thanks, >> > > >>> > > Alex >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> > > >>> > rmannibucau@gmail.com >> > > >>> > > >wrote: >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > > I meant forking it for the release "as usual", >> > > > not using a snapshot >> > > >>> > which >> > > >>> > > > wouldn't be professional >> > > >>> > > > >> > > >>> > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* >> > > >>> > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau >> > > > * >> > > >>> > > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >> > > >>> > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >> > > >>> > > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >> > > >>> > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* >> > > >>> > > > >> > > >>> > > > >> > > >>> > > > >> > > >>> > > > 2013/10/8 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO >> > > >>> > > > >> > > >>> > > > > Possible, but I would only release TomEE itself not >> > > > all modules to >> > > >>> > > avoid >> > > >>> > > > > depending on a snapshot. >> > > >>> > > > > TomEE is different because if the snapshot is >> > > > available during the >> > > >>> > > build, >> > > >>> > > > > which is obviously the case, we can embedded the >> > > > JAR file in the >> > > >>> zip >> > > >>> > > > file. >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > JLouis >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > 2013/10/8 Romain Manni-Bucau >> > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > technically it is possible >> > > >>> > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* >> > > >>> > > > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau >> > > > * >> > > >>> > > > > > *Blog: >> > > > **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >> > > >>> > > > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >> > > >>> > > > > > *LinkedIn: >> > > > **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >> > > >>> > > > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* >> > > >>> > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > 2013/10/8 Alex The Rocker >> > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > Otherwise, can a TomEE 1.6.0 official >> > > > release be make with a >> > > >>> > > snapshot >> > > >>> > > > > > > OpenJPA 2.3 ? >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > I'm concerned if we have no >> > > > visibility >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > Thanks, >> > > >>> > > > > > > Alex >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Romain >> > > > Manni-Bucau < >> > > >>> > > > > > rmannibucau@gmail.com >> > > >>> > > > > > > >wrote: >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > Would mean reverting some code in >> > > > openejb + forking >> > > >>> > openwebbeans >> > > >>> > > > and >> > > >>> > > > > > > update >> > > >>> > > > > > > > the code + accepting to not work in >> > > > some cases in java >> > > >>> 7...so I >> > > >>> > > > don't >> > > >>> > > > > > > think >> > > >>> > > > > > > > so. >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* >> > > >>> > > > > > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau >> > > > * >> > > >>> > > > > > > > *Blog: >> > > > **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >> > > >>> > > > > > > > *LinkedIn: >> > > > **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >> > > >>> > > > > > > > *Github: >> > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau* >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > 2013/10/8 Alex The Rocker >> > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > From OpenJPA's web site: >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > The 2.x releases >> > > > > > > >>> > >> > > >>> > > > (2.2.2 >> > > >>> > > > > > is >> > > >>> > > > > > > > the >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > latest) are a production ready, >> > > > compliant implementation of >> > > >>> > the >> > > >>> > > > > > JSR-317 >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > Java Persistence 2.0 >> > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > specification, >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > which is backwards compatible >> > > > to the JPA 1.0 specification >> > > >>> > and >> > > >>> > > > > passes >> > > >>> > > > > > > the >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > Sun JPA 2.0 Technology >> > > > Compatibility Kit. >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > The upcoming 2.3 release is >> > > > based off of the 2.2.x release >> > > >>> > > stream >> > > >>> > > > > and >> > > >>> > > > > > > > will >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > contain some additional >> > > > features (TBD). >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > No way to know when OpenJPA 2.3 >> > > > could be available. >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > Can't we have a TomEE 1.6.0 >> > > > release based on OpenJPA 2.2.2 >> > > >>> > > which >> > > >>> > > > is >> > > >>> > > > > > > > already >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > TCK compliant, and leave >> > > > OpenJPA 2.3 for a future TomEE >> > > >>> > > release? >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > Thanks, >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > Alex >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:21 PM, >> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau < >> > > >>> > > > > > > > rmannibucau@gmail.com >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >wrote: >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > @Alex: 2.3.0, there are >> > > > working on it but want to address >> > > >>> > few >> > > >>> > > > > > > blocking >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > issues before AFAIK >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau >> > > > > > > >>> >* >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > *Blog: >> > > > **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > *LinkedIn: >> > > > **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > *Github: >> > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau* >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > 2013/10/8 Alex The Rocker >> > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > @Romain: which >> > > > OpenJPA release are you waiting to make >> > > >>> > > TomEE >> > > >>> > > > > > 1.6.0 >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > generally available, >> > > > and what is this OpenJPA release's >> > > >>> > > > > schedule? >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Alex >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 >> > > > at 11:01 AM, zmirc < >> > > >>> > m_chirac@yahoo.com >> > > >>> > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > wrote: >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > I would really >> > > > want to know that, too. >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > -- >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > View this >> > > > message in context: >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/1-6-0-release-plans-tp4665437p466544= 7.html >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from the >> > > > OpenEJB User mailing list archive at >> > > >>> > > > > Nabble.com. >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > > -- >> > > >>> > > > > Jean-Louis >> > > >>> > > > > >> > > >>> > > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> -- >> > > >>> Jean-Louis >> > > >>> >> > > > >> > > >> > >>