yup, gonna start with cutting the actual release in a few hours.
The next projects on the list are xbean and OpenWebBeans.
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <users@tomee.apache.org>
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 17:14
> Subject: Re: 1.6.0 release plans?
>
> Hi
>
> OpenJPA release work started, Jira are almost closed and the release
> should start soon
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
>
> 2013/10/29 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3tal@gmail.com>:
>> Hello TomEE team,
>>
>> Would you please update us with TomEE 1.6.0 official release?
>> For example, was the action mentionned by jean-Louis on OpenJPA done?
>> When is planned something like an official beta or "release
> candidate" ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alex.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
> <jeanouii@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> First, push an official mail on OpenJPA mailling list asking for a
> 2.3.0
>>> release. Waiting an answer within the usual 72 hours for example.
>>> If no answer or no way to get a release by October 20th or so (I
> don't
>>> care), then fork it internally as we did sometimes in the past and
> start
>>> releasing TomEE by end of November.
>>>
>>> That means more or less that we must freeze/finalize all on-going
>>> development by October the 15th I think.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Jean-Louis
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/10/8 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> > Technically yes, then the issue is we need somebody with all perms
> to
>>> > release tomee (ping @David?).
>>> >
>>> > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2013/10/8 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3tal@gmail.com>
>>> >
>>> > > @Romain, not sure to understand the details, but do you mean
> you may
>>> > have a
>>> > > way to release TomEE+ 1.6.0 official release without waiting
> for the
>>> > > (unknown) OpenJPA 2.3.0 release?
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks,
>>> > > Alex
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>> > rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>> > > >wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > I meant forking it for the release "as usual",
> not using a snapshot
>>> > which
>>> > > > wouldn't be professional
>>> > > >
>>> > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>> > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau
> <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>> > > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>> > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>> > > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>> > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > 2013/10/8 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeanouii@gmail.com>
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Possible, but I would only release TomEE itself not
> all modules to
>>> > > avoid
>>> > > > > depending on a snapshot.
>>> > > > > TomEE is different because if the snapshot is
> available during the
>>> > > build,
>>> > > > > which is obviously the case, we can embedded the
> JAR file in the
>>> zip
>>> > > > file.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > JLouis
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > 2013/10/8 Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > technically it is possible
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>> > > > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau
> <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>> > > > > > *Blog:
> **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>> > > > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>> > > > > > *LinkedIn:
> **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>> > > > > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > 2013/10/8 Alex The Rocker
> <alex.m3tal@gmail.com>
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Otherwise, can a TomEE 1.6.0 official
> release be make with a
>>> > > snapshot
>>> > > > > > > OpenJPA 2.3 ?
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > I'm concerned if we have no
> visibility
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > Alex
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Romain
> Manni-Bucau <
>>> > > > > > rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>> > > > > > > >wrote:
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Would mean reverting some code in
> openejb + forking
>>> > openwebbeans
>>> > > > and
>>> > > > > > > update
>>> > > > > > > > the code + accepting to not work in
> some cases in java
>>> 7...so I
>>> > > > don't
>>> > > > > > > think
>>> > > > > > > > so.
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>> > > > > > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau
> <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>> > > > > > > > *Blog:
> **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>> > > > > > > >
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>> > > > > > > > *LinkedIn:
> **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>> > > > > > > > *Github:
> https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > 2013/10/8 Alex The Rocker
> <alex.m3tal@gmail.com>
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > From OpenJPA's web site:
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
> =============================================================================
>>> > > > > > > > > The 2.x releases
> <http://openjpa.apache.org/downloads.html
>>> >
>>> > > > (2.2.2
>>> > > > > > is
>>> > > > > > > > the
>>> > > > > > > > > latest) are a production ready,
> compliant implementation of
>>> > the
>>> > > > > > JSR-317
>>> > > > > > > > > Java Persistence 2.0
> <http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=317>
>>> > > > > > > > specification,
>>> > > > > > > > > which is backwards compatible
> to the JPA 1.0 specification
>>> > and
>>> > > > > passes
>>> > > > > > > the
>>> > > > > > > > > Sun JPA 2.0 Technology
> Compatibility Kit.
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > The upcoming 2.3 release is
> based off of the 2.2.x release
>>> > > stream
>>> > > > > and
>>> > > > > > > > will
>>> > > > > > > > > contain some additional
> features (TBD).
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
> =============================================================================
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > No way to know when OpenJPA 2.3
> could be available.
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > Can't we have a TomEE 1.6.0
> release based on OpenJPA 2.2.2
>>> > > which
>>> > > > is
>>> > > > > > > > already
>>> > > > > > > > > TCK compliant, and leave
> OpenJPA 2.3 for a future TomEE
>>> > > release?
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > Alex
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:21 PM,
> Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>> > > > > > > > rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>> > > > > > > > > >wrote:
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > @Alex: 2.3.0, there are
> working on it but want to address
>>> > few
>>> > > > > > > blocking
>>> > > > > > > > > > issues before AFAIK
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>> > > > > > > > > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau
> <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau
>>> >*
>>> > > > > > > > > > *Blog:
> **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>> > > > > > > > > >
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>> > > > > > > > > > *LinkedIn:
> **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>> > > > > > > > > > *Github:
> https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > 2013/10/8 Alex The Rocker
> <alex.m3tal@gmail.com>
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > @Romain: which
> OpenJPA release are you waiting to make
>>> > > TomEE
>>> > > > > > 1.6.0
>>> > > > > > > > > > > generally available,
> and what is this OpenJPA release's
>>> > > > > schedule?
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > > > > > Alex
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013
> at 11:01 AM, zmirc <
>>> > m_chirac@yahoo.com
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > I would really
> want to know that, too.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > --
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > View this
> message in context:
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/1-6-0-release-plans-tp4665437p4665447.html
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from the
> OpenEJB User mailing list archive at
>>> > > > > Nabble.com.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > --
>>> > > > > Jean-Louis
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Louis
>>>
>
|