tomee-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0
Date Fri, 27 May 2016 16:30:42 GMT
Reviewed quickly the tentacle report.
Downloaded the sources from the staging repo and ran a build.

Got some failures with timings and the multicast module failing.
Looks like it does not work under mac. I have seen a system property to
skip them. Might appear as blocker but they aren't cause I don't think they
are useful (system out instead of asserts for most of the cases). They have
been always failing with anyone complaining.

I might drop them at some point fix them when I have a bit of time.

So here is my +1

Thanks Romain




--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
jgallimore@tomitribe.com> wrote:

> Thanks Romain, I'll take a look tonight.
>
> Jon
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > for the one using tentacle to check notice/license files: i uploaded it
> > there http://home.apache.org/~rmannibucau/orgapachetomee-1097/ (skipped
> > binaries/exploded folders cause my network connection doesn't allow that
> > ATM)
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> >
> > 2016-05-24 12:32 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > @Jon: no cause we didn't change any dependencies outside asf
> > >
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> > > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > >
> > > 2016-05-24 11:57 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> > >
> > >> I did a run over dependencies and couldn't find anything.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> So here is my
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> LieGrue,
> > >> strub
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > On Monday, 23 May 2016, 23:48, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > >> rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > Le 23 mai 2016 23:42, "Jean-Louis Monteiro"
> > >> > <jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> a
> > >> > écrit :
> > >> >>
> > >> >>  So what is the status regarding the LICENSE and NOTICE?
> > >> >
> > >> > Nothing patrticular.
> > >> >
> > >> >>  Don't want to spend time checking the release if there is still
> > >> pending
> > >> >>  tasks to do.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>  We have agreed that the documentation needs to be clear regarding
> > the
> > >> >>  status of this release (not Java EE 6 certified nor Java EE 7
> > >> certified).
> > >> >>  Could we have that download page to be split into something like
2
> > >> parts:
> > >> >>  1.x and 7.x
> > >> >>  With the information on the policy at the top.
> > >> >>  Each section explicitly mentioning which Java EE version are
we
> > >> >>  implementing, if it is certified and what is complete or not
in
> the
> > >> TomEE
> > >> >>  7.x
> > >> >>  The current version with all the links at the top looks now a
bit
> > >> messy
> > >> > and
> > >> >>  the policy on a separate page makes it difficult to find out
in my
> > >> > opinion.
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> > Was planning to just keep 1 version by minor for maintained
> releases +
> > >> link
> > >> > the version policy. All other versions would go in archives. That
is
> > my
> > >> > second task once vote passed.
> > >> >
> > >> > This is however out of vote scope, version policy page work has been
> > >> done
> > >> > and nobody complained in 5 days so guess it is fine to go then we
> can
> > >> > enhance it if needed but i dont see it anymore as a blocker -
> compared
> > >> to
> > >> > the lack of votes ;).
> > >> >
> > >> >>  That seemed to be the agreement of the last vote.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>  That said, I spent some time grabbing the sources and trying
to
> > >> compile
> > >> >>  without success.
> > >> >>  XAPoolTest keeps failing locally when I run it with openejb-core
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> > The code of this vote was green on buildbot when tagged so can
> likely
> > be
> > >> > something else or envrt dpd. Ping me if you need help.
> > >> >
> > >> >>  Alone it works. I'll check that out tomorrow if I can get the
test
> > >> > fixed
> > >> >>  and more reliable (if possible).
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks for taking time to have a look.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >>  --
> > >> >>  Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > >> >>  http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > >> >>  http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >> >>
> > >> >>  On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:16 PM, John D. Ament
> > >> > <johndament@apache.org>
> > >> >>  wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>  > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:40 PM David Blevins
> > >> > <david.blevins@gmail.com>
> > >> >>  > wrote:
> > >> >>  >
> > >> >>  > >
> > >> >>  > > > On May 19, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<
> > >> >>  > rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> > >> >>  > > wrote:
> > >> >>  > > >
> > >> >>  > > > 2016-05-20 1:23 GMT+02:00 David Blevins
> > >> > <david.blevins@gmail.com>:
> > >> >>  > > >
> > >> >>  > > >> Also, we’ve historically done a preview
run in advance
> > >> > of an
> > >> > official
> > >> >>  > > vote
> > >> >>  > > >> for major releases:
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > > >>  [PREVIEW] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1034)
> > >> >>  > > >>  http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/jjiheacmtd4tb6qw
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > > >>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-092)
> > >> >>  > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/u6ripoz3lsxvcron
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > > >>  1.0.0 preview binaries
> > >> >>  > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/f6ix44zeqlcaet3w
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > > >>  [preview] OpenEJB 4.5.1/TomEE 1.5.1 (staging-132)
> > >> >>  > > >>  http://markmail.org/message/l3rvltbc3az7xu65
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > > >> Binary comparison of this release to previous
to help
> > >> > with LICENSE
> > >> > and
> > >> >>  > > >> NOTICE file updates:
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > > >>  1.0.0 - 1.5.0
> > >> > http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/ppvkyeznaryjluve
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > > >>  1.5.0 - 1.5.1
> > >> > http://markmail.org/message/pmwkycgdrz2php6n
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > > >>  1.5.1 - 1.6.0
> > >> > http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/xwy56krafcxm3kgs
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > > >> And RAT scan:
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > > >> - http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d
<
> > >> >>  > > >> http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d>
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > > >> Also preemptive note, despite that “72 hours”
has been
> > >> > in all the
> > >> > vote
> > >> >>  > > >> threads, we’ve always left votes open longer
to ensure
> > >> > everyone has
> > >> >>  > > time to
> > >> >>  > > >> give feedback.  So I’m hoping the response
is not “you
> > >> > have 72
> > >> > hours
> > >> >>  > to
> > >> >>  > > do
> > >> >>  > > >> this” as they’ve historically been done
by the release
> > >> > manager.
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > > >> Can we consider this a preview release and
execute the
> > >> > diffs, rat
> > >> >>  > > reports
> > >> >>  > > >> and ensure our LICENSE and NOTICE files are
up to date?
> > >> > Or at the
> > >> >>  > very
> > >> >>  > > >> least pause this vote till that stuff is done.
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > > > 6 months ago I would have said yes but since v7
is > 1
> > >> > year old
> > >> > think
> > >> >>  > we
> > >> >>  > > > got all the time to do all the fancy stuff we
want and if
> > >> > not done
> > >> > in 1
> > >> >>  > > > year will likely not be done now so *personally*
I don't
> > >> > accept any
> > >> >>  > > excuse
> > >> >>  > > > anymore to delay a release.
> > >> >>  > >
> > >> >>  > > Just an FYI that incorrect LICENSE and NOTICE files
is a
> > >> > showstopper
> > >> > for
> > >> >>  > > any release and not subject to majority vote.
> > >> >>  > >
> > >> >>  >
> > >> >>  > For a TLP, it definitely is.
> > >> >>  >
> > >> >>  >
> > >> >>  > >
> > >> >>  > > I’ve had to reroll countless releases because they
were wrong,
> > >> > hence
> > >> >>  > > putting effort into those practices.
> > >> >>  > >
> > >> >>  > >
> > >> >>  > > -David
> > >> >>  > >
> > >> >>  > >
> > >> >>  > > >
> > >> >>  > > >
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > > >> --
> > >> >>  > > >> David Blevins
> > >> >>  > > >> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > >> >>  > > >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > > >>> On May 19, 2016, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins
<
> > >> > david.blevins@gmail.com
> > >> >>  > >
> > >> >>  > > >> wrote:
> > >> >>  > > >>>
> > >> >>  > > >>> Can you put up a proposed page for the
download and
> > >> > I can give
> > >> >>  > feedback
> > >> >>  > > >> on how it should be updated.  Let’s start
another
> > >> > thread.
> > >> >>  > > >>>
> > >> >>  > > >>> I’m obviously very time constrained,
but happy to
> > >> > give you time
> > >> > and
> > >> >>  > > work
> > >> >>  > > >> openly on it.
> > >> >>  > > >>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>
> > >> >>  > > >>> --
> > >> >>  > > >>> David Blevins
> > >> >>  > > >>> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > >> > <http://twitter.com/dblevins>
> > >> >>  > > >>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >> >>  > > >>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>> On May 19, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Romain
Manni-Bucau
> > >> > <
> > >> >>  > > rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > >> >>  > > >> <mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >> >>  > > >>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>> @David:
> > >> > http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html <
> > >> >>  > > >> http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html>,
> > >> > just added a
> > >> >>  > > >>>> link on the download page
> > >> >>  > > http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html.Think
> > >> >>  > > >> <http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html.Think>
the
> > >> >>  > > >>>> information is there but don't hesitate
to
> > >> > tune/customize/update
> > >> > the
> > >> >>  > > >>>> website until you are fully happy
with it.
> > >> >>  > > >>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >> >>  > > >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau
> > >> > <
> > >> >>  > > >> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> |
 Blog
> > >> >>  > > >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
<
> > >> >>  > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > > >> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau
<
> > >> >>  > > https://github.com/rmannibucau>>
> > >> >>  > > >> |
> > >> >>  > > >>>> LinkedIn
> > >> > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau <
> > >> >>  > > >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>>
|
> > >> > Tomitriber
> > >> >>  > > >>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >> > <http://www.tomitribe.com/>> | JavaEE
> > >> >>  > > Factory
> > >> >>  > > >>>>
> > >> > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com <
> > >> >>  > > >> https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com/>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>> 2016-05-19 21:03 GMT+02:00 David Blevins
> > >> > <david.blevins@gmail.com
> > >> >>  > > >> <mailto:david.blevins@gmail.com>>:
> > >> >>  > > >>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>> Also the download page would need
to be
> > >> > updated.  It currently
> > >> > says
> > >> >>  > > >> “Java
> > >> >>  > > >>>>> EE 6 compliant” and we would
need to remove
> > >> > that and replace it
> > >> >>  > with
> > >> >>  > > >> “NOT
> > >> >>  > > >>>>> Java EE 7 compliant”.  That
text should be a
> > >> > link to an
> > >> > explanation
> > >> >>  > > of
> > >> >>  > > >> why
> > >> >>  > > >>>>> and an explanation of the version
number.
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>> --
> > >> >>  > > >>>>> David Blevins
> > >> >>  > > >>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > >> > <http://twitter.com/dblevins>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>> On May 19, 2016, at 11:59
AM, David
> > >> > Blevins <
> > >> >>  > > david.blevins@gmail.com>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>> Where is the documentation
page again?
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>> --
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>> David Blevins
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > >> > <http://twitter.com/dblevins>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> On May 18, 2016, at 12:39
AM, Romain
> > >> > Manni-Bucau <
> > >> >>  > > >> rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > >> >>  > > >>>>> <mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com>>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> Hi
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> As mentionned and after
the vote
> > >> > about the version here is the
> > >> >>  > > 7.0.0
> > >> >>  > > >>>>> vote.
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> Here are the release notes:
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > >
> > >> >>  >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051
> > >> >>  > > >>>>> <
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > >
> > >> >>  >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> Keys file is still the
same:
> > >> >>  > > https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> As discussed pushed the
tag on
> > >> > github:
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> New staging repository
is
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  >
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1097
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> Dev dist is
> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> Vote will be open for
72h or until
> > >> > we get 3 +1 bindings.
> > >> > Binding
> > >> >>  > or
> > >> >>  > > >> not
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> everyone is very welcomed
to test
> > >> > and vote.
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> Please vote:
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 yeah it rocks!
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> [ ] +0 dont' know just
wanted to
> > >> > say hello but no idea what we
> > >> >>  > are
> > >> >>  > > >>>>> talking
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> about
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 no cause ${blocker
<-
> > >> > X}
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> @rmannibucau
> > >> > <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > >> >>  > > >>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau>
|
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> LinkedIn
> > >> > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
> > >> > Tomitriber
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
|
> > >> > JavaEE Factory
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>>>
> > >> >>  > > >>>
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > > >>
> > >> >>  > >
> > >> >>  > >
> > >> >>  >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Gallimore
> http://twitter.com/jongallimore
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message