Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6773A200CF3 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 22:54:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 660351609CA; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 20:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id ACF0B1609C3 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 22:54:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 11084 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2017 20:54:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 11072 invoked by uid 99); 13 Sep 2017 20:54:35 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 20:54:35 +0000 Received: from Christophers-MacBook-Pro.local (pool-173-66-116-184.washdc.fios.verizon.net [173.66.116.184]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 9A7991A0029 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 20:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Jmeter throughput with tomcat To: users@tomcat.apache.org References: From: Christopher Schultz Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:54:32 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 20:54:38 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Raviraj, On 9/13/17 1:38 PM, RAVIRAJ SHAH wrote: > Dear all I have checked performance of my tomcat server 9. 0.26 > with jmeter with 1000 threads which gives me 142 throughput/sec > Whereas same test i done with jboss wildfly and it gives 450 > throughput/sec > > What could be reason for the same it jboss wildfly is better than > tomcat in context to performance Configuration, please? What is the workload? - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZuZsIAAoJEBzwKT+lPKRY8tcP/0jxmpqeRdTakGhmC7DOLpAe I7mpxl41toxCm2d2It/6edvYujRvTzDKrj7ut3oSsMRvmvdZ/QYzgoL9nHFniv9r yu7nhAFgDCdUw9er67LgtDZ+4Dsb2G2ENKWUFLQoSBQNk1SKxWVWLPSalBzEOlys G7A1KUvZfaBpbvWLkdGQnKCtyUPAv+NkYJv2QFg0wJaOBixCLeAxO4BQnDQO0udb TrvfkpWg3ckvGfWV+vlQesb0dCWKfwit/rs3ATEONVmcqP/wAsj04JJCtouNsNyM FScr5xV2xB6ltvVGZGcJvDgnTYh5TK2zK4woBU+jjnooWbwNVgUfbs9tB8V8T258 2M/7/q90ViyLgtCg7V9CWiCyuTOTunjvvqH3mAuAWo62qFR5tG6gF5jcJxul1ZjA pvZ/i62WEXW37PyBLi9bPEF2c3VeC3kIh95Wdt2eVQUKFv5jDllIE7ggraD/Kx5x 3aITsxd9nqJwdCoe0KXAquU63YgCVpUY0uvUKgnOveQyQUMVfhyIspt+2mPHltbi oPeJY+ufLchRb0BYoe7L1EzYpCw0G3Q6d9fU7Ta72fkiOy+knp7utrY7g6tHxb99 pRWRCES9PJpSGoEJez58EgxmF+sfuTS5VmK5XimtgiYPrbxow3PTWSg+kAzUg8nd euwLjrUhdYg8MdGjLKyC =BMqO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org