Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F71918609 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35177 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2016 02:40:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 35115 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2016 02:40:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 35102 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2016 02:40:23 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:40:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 903EF1A00A2 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:40:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.28 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.28 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=alum-lehigh-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zTR224UhE8CC for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:40:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com (mail-ob0-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1A3F8429A6 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:40:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id xk3so9223209obc.2 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 18:40:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alum-lehigh-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=g13NM953ZGyiGLg+HdJjZfCzf+E8+HdpWtIIFp4d4eY=; b=gnnsB8Ve91i+WJf5q5BtuJrGu+/Q+eHV53gOFPvkrj8fO+ZfifbUORP8s05d2cijOL /wsqKecRcYomkF9kV/2o8bg87DbIaWRmuEzzXn4nd6xDKeIZ6s6EpuCJHqXi+Gg+bb08 5noHH+z1Mo/+R61lT6cUVlom0VrgtIf3syjKeklKhcytNztWZJB6PdQhRw7jdMnq7rqI URtvvaH9fQWNHmVNKRugtsVLRad7uY3f4OK2A/03htjsjeeYN6BKlJiFuHWlcO3qPWRK 3PchxIE86r9mHQwHEwtb2oz9kOT6YmjoVxF7pjbJl/IYHT4/ViZeX0zKv5LtahrN62Yh wOqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=g13NM953ZGyiGLg+HdJjZfCzf+E8+HdpWtIIFp4d4eY=; b=XPbkPnHlk0MjLtPpAnPOQ2D5A9TtuoLLanBBRrIp/zvZzwcnMQmuCkzKqVU8RjEBn/ UT5mWK49k2vsutZGICA613HLf28OJvEyahY3Gc4wjPAQcmON3WlFJaKY8msktTjchZmM CJUW0ZKYGdg+mdZwFDbM30r1dMRLJbB1h99dARnoFFoIK/ua0MJVQ7BBP3gC1JAfugRt C2S5lRSYjyPWqNEzHXoAlyqZHio3/5c9k8mQfanssH7FTXlDFsIW2Z8L/WVUhGpr4XMh FJhuBBr2c45/YH3XNog4AhC15v6ZA/Jt6H2/MbMw4F8hHwerrHohCF9yh+kqed3VoqQq BF1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSVu2GMqS/TLyOUeiR9TFKEZHbE6lsi+ZAHPKXCCBrV9ltQaVcYQF7tmMjqSta/o5XmB8YraItS7z2SPw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.233.193 with SMTP id ty1mr12331968oec.0.1455072020666; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 18:40:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.59.2 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 18:40:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 21:40:20 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Tomcat feature request From: Jason Ricles To: Tomcat Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1136af70ea5db5052b615a60 --001a1136af70ea5db5052b615a60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Is there any formal forum to make a feature request for tomcat? I noticed I was having a silent failure with a binary websocket with tomcat since I didn't flip the bytebuffer from write to read and the send kept failing down at the low level of the code without any error being thrown. With that in mind, I was thinking it would be useful to explicitly throw that an error happened since I spent 1.5 days to debug that when I changed the code I just forgot to flip the bytebuffer and had no excpetion being thrown, it would thus be very helpful for debugging purposes. --001a1136af70ea5db5052b615a60--