Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A59518F6E for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49453 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2015 20:26:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 49392 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2015 20:26:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 49381 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2015 20:26:29 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:26:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 26B6C1A28D2 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:26:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.12 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.12 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GTfi5UfyRycc for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:26:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com (mail-ig0-f180.google.com [209.85.213.180]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 83C032164F for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:26:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igcpe7 with SMTP id pe7so307922igc.0 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 13:26:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date :to:mime-version; bh=YOnHqBQkvSs7mKXFjfLsRTMFVoLhCr4VWcKPUhr64FQ=; b=DCn/FczdfK8do5i/kSWsi2b/l6RveESre8i1j2oc7CUu0YSPt4nN5RhpNLKHKxzSw8 GvrDxd1dzyJJwqeRZ+TfIWT62a6ppRX4fnkMOQfdFG/M5UVOdNhs+oOJMcnB5qBeji+U P0uNEyW6iqkQ4N9PUYn5bc5X0IV2We0M1Ezh9u3nyn32EX2AH8U9U8rgDn8DsOqN02xM 2jWI1Ead+yCneyy/5wp7XE4Wa8L89Z36ViUbsn98zOTfa1Tz71BBiSgcv+hJ7ljZRa5e 9ZvfNHGnxiwy65hRLg/yMbJIxQNctJaV3D1fqn+58EW8TXDYaViYDYBSOKbYxgD+bHMS OpoQ== X-Received: by 10.50.88.9 with SMTP id bc9mr9688675igb.31.1444681584963; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 13:26:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.31.38.186] ([12.104.205.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x1sm5483588igl.14.2015.10.12.13.26.24 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Oct 2015 13:26:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Millett Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: questions about tomcat 7 executor with rest services Message-Id: Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:26:30 -0500 To: Tomcat Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.0 \(3094\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3094) I=E2=80=99m looking for some insight / info into using executor thread = pool for a tomcat 7 server that handles many REST services. =20 Wondering if a large maxThreads in an Executor would have better through = put than the same maxThreads for a normal connector? What scenario would encourage the use of an Executor over a normal = connector?=20 Thanks.= --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org