tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cris Berneburg - US <cberneb...@caci.com>
Subject RE: tomcat on windows 2012 weirdness
Date Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:15:22 GMT
Chris

Thanks again for your replies.  Meh, sorry for the double-negative about the cookies.  :-)

One thing I learned by trial and error is that accessing the internal web site by name behaves
wrongly, but accessing it by IP behaves rightly!

Also, I must be wrong about the cookies being enabled/disabled anyway.  I did the IE9 trace
Ameer suggested, and it was revealing.  It appears the cookies are conditional depending on
how the server is accessed.  Will follow up in another message.

--
Cris Berneburg, Lead Software Engineer
CACI, IRMA Project, 703-679-5313


-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:chris@christopherschultz.net] 
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 3:15 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat on windows 2012 weirdness

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Ameer,

On 12/12/14 3:11 PM, Ameer Mawia wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Christopher Schultz < 
> chris@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> 
> Cris,
> 
> On 12/12/14 2:18 PM, Cris Berneburg - US wrote:
>>>> Hi Chris
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for your replies.  I am somewhat new to Tomcat, only been 
>>>> using it for 1 year, so some of the technical details are new to 
>>>> me.
>>>> 
>>>>> Is it possible that you are not using URL-based session ids, and 
>>>>> that your browser has cookies disabled via a policy?
>>>> 
>>>> I will need to check URL-based session ids.  How do I check?
> 
> If your browser has cookies disabled, then all the links on the web 
> pages in this web application should have a ";jsessionid=[id]"
> path parameter added to them. See below.
> 
>>>> Also, my browser does not have cookies disabled.
> 
> This is almost certainly the issue.
> 
> 
>> Chris, I think he meant cookies are already enabled on his browser.

Ah! A double-negative. I read too quickly.

Well, the protocol analyzer will certainly help inform the conversation.

- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=lmci
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message