Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1286517C8F for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 09:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29947 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2014 09:55:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 29876 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2014 09:55:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 29865 invoked by uid 99); 7 Nov 2014 09:55:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:55:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cjderham@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.51] (HELO mail-qa0-f51.google.com) (209.85.216.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:55:07 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id f12so2010387qad.24 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 01:52:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=ZMWzoWktiND1DOLe6T7e/BlmsdjmqA3yqKwe+b7oOYs=; b=AxJAihl7YCMwu+mfLKOSgoJLRI5kImAZOeExCvPsuFhkoYKANuGG1NjKF7XdWK9D2C q4YZsX504DnM18xMFmdTRAGlHuH5YZ++slD2OLJJQ4M4RF73iKQsOx3QymUEsXRDWWLP lQTPoVhOsAx9MEijiR9WL65yyfBQMw+skU26/NR8ZphjORDhE0n3Y41M7gUUD5NwcS38 m7q3Ho6I/icfxovIZSSiCqaKZM45mi2fJuIdRIxS3S5Z/6y1OLrom7auuFZ1HvcN0gro 587REPeutPi4fOJsw6AONkUd0rdGrpB8qaperfib/DbgU1QJLWR/Ly4hQgRggd6tzbZI gb7A== X-Received: by 10.140.22.201 with SMTP id 67mr406736qgn.16.1415353971130; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 01:52:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: chris@derham.me.uk Sender: cjderham@gmail.com Received: by 10.96.110.227 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 01:52:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <545BE1AF.3000201@christopherschultz.net> References: <545BA2EF.4020502@ergon.ch> <545BE1AF.3000201@christopherschultz.net> From: chris derham Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 07:52:30 -0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3h44Y0mBHIgSQfPGpSnBaLmLhxI Message-ID: Subject: Re: Spurious Problem starting Tomcat7 (garbled class names) To: Tomcat Users List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >> example with to garbled classes: (3.class being the first, which >> must come from SomeClass$3.class and the second one being something >> awefully beautiful: >> ConfigEdiAtourtAhpepnltiiccaattiioonn$SAtpaptlei$cIadteinotniCfo^@^@iigeLro.acdlLaissstener.class To prevent decompilation, you can run your classes through a code obfuscator. That replaces all field/method/class names with garbage, to make it harder to see what is going on. The garbage you see might actually be the names in the jar files. Unzip the war/jars and see what is actually in there. Could it be correct? HTH Chris --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org