Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E7A317DCB for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 14:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29608 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2014 14:10:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 29541 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2014 14:10:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 29529 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2014 14:10:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 14:10:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of knst.kolinko@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.65 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.65] (HELO mail-qg0-f65.google.com) (209.85.192.65) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 14:10:17 +0000 Received: by mail-qg0-f65.google.com with SMTP id z107so873908qgd.0 for ; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 06:08:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ii6+YvnN8+6afwccK5lpD7pSoHwxSVfiaYTcce53pAM=; b=QOvghAacom08NxvO4wUkDeJZ4GqA+DAIC3DjvW7wp+n7ndfesJbZO1I4lt9cQolTrL mILZhwBTf2Zv0qxxka159nqbpkXWHm8cu8zTa+mWByZza7+DL/WLn9EVQXCMWgv4gdBc rrVUVh56V4168dhPcRIh2Xp1gIBKhmuwCcdHzLRcAryZjxPzr03jpQE9bZyLFrU55RYd /1BjH0aiip4w4NStWlZFrZhanAL7MY87sJNBoNV2bmcyvmjFejxvXHLthSIXnixePDBA yUuD5POK4Uar4gVUOO/i0SgV4Uchm0EjYT17jv41T9wbo92ZG8JS3UxaShWtaDtXWbuB 6rqQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.93.18 with SMTP id t18mr27580061qam.102.1415455726764; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 06:08:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.106.227 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 06:08:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <545D27E9.8060207@christopherschultz.net> References: <20141107135147.000075b9@hcs.us.com> <545D27E9.8060207@christopherschultz.net> Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 17:08:46 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: isELIgnored default is wrong From: Konstantin Kolinko To: Tomcat Users List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >> I worked around the problem by adding the following to the JSP >> files: >> >> <%@ page isELIgnored="false" %> >> >> However, I'd like to understand where the configuration error is >> occurring as from my perspective nothing changed except OS and >> Tomcat version. My own efforts have turned up nothing helpful or >> illuminating. >> >> Where should I be looking in the configurations for a difference? >> What differences would come into play? > > What is your tag library declaration in your JSP file? That's probably > the most important thing, here. Are you supplying your own version of > JSTL, EL, etc. along with your web application? > +1. There have been several user reports when Apache Maven packed conflicting API implementation jars into a war file. I do not remember it resulting in such symptoms, but things were going awry for those affected. I would suggest trying the following: 1) Add logEffectiveWebXml="true" to your Context and see how that web.xml is actually interpreted by Tomcat (considering all web fragments and annotations) http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/context.html 2) Run in "strict servlet compliance" mode. That will enable validation of your web.xml against schema. http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/systemprops.html#Specification 3) Are there any errors, warnings in the log files? If that does not help, then maybe a) inspect the java code generated for your JSPs b) run with a debugger https://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Developing#Debugging c) try with 7.0.42 on Windows, and then with intermediate versions up to 7.0.56 to see when the problem appeared. d) test with 7.0.57 (a release candidate is currently in the voting process on dev@) e) simplify your web application until you have a reproducible test case that you can show others The examples webapp has EL on its pages and those are certainly working. f) update you web.xml to version 3.0 and configure it to avoid annotation scanning https://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/HowTo/FasterStartUp Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org