Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BD8D11620 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 06:09:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66865 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2014 06:08:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 66792 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2014 06:08:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 66782 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2014 06:08:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 06:08:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [65.20.0.179] (HELO rgout02.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk) (65.20.0.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 06:08:55 +0000 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090201.53B4F35E.00D3,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=27/50,refid=2.7.2:2014.6.30.231819:17:27.888,ip=86.183.135.76,rules=__USER_AGENT, __IN_REP_TO, __MIME_VERSION, __CTE, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, CT_TEXT_PLAIN_UTF8_CAPS, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __HAS_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __ANY_URI, __FRAUD_BODY_WEBMAIL, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, BODY_SIZE_200_299, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, __URI_NS, SXL_IP_DYNAMIC[76.135.183.86.fur], HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, SMALL_BODY, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from mail.homeinbox.net (86.183.135.76) by rgout02.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.122.06) (authenticated as medthomas@btinternet.com) id 53B1F52700374776 for users@tomcat.apache.org; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 07:08:30 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80D4920287 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 07:05:23 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at homeinbox.net Received: from mail.homeinbox.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.homeinbox.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j9grz-ABnUAp for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 07:05:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from marksphone.dev.local (marksphone.dev.local [192.168.23.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C6EE9201AD for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 07:05:23 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: Interface default methods From: Mark Thomas Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 07:05:15 +0100 To: Tomcat Users List Message-ID: <683f22ea-cfe7-421d-8f05-16eef2544428@email.android.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 3 July 2014 04:11:32 GMT+01:00, Leo Donahue wrote: >I don't want to start a war, but just curious if the Tomcat developers >see >any use case for adding default methods to any of the Interfaces in the >API? Which API? Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org