Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73567100F0 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:36:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73735 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2014 14:36:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 73564 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2014 14:36:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 73539 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2014 14:36:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:36:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aw@ice-sa.com designates 212.85.38.229 as permitted sender) Received: from [212.85.38.229] (HELO tor.combios.es) (212.85.38.229) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:36:35 +0000 Received: from [192.168.245.129] (HSI-KBW-46-237-206-233.hsi.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de [46.237.206.233]) (Authenticated sender: andre.warnier@ice-sa.com) by tor.combios.es (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C52F93C2ABC for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:36:36 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <52F8E3D6.3070205@ice-sa.com> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:36:06 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Warnier?= Reply-To: Tomcat Users List User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat Issue with iplanet 7.0.15 References: <0FF966BEE7BA644D9D509FECE0530586AB37A9@BANURBNA09.e2k.ad.ge.com> In-Reply-To: <0FF966BEE7BA644D9D509FECE0530586AB37A9@BANURBNA09.e2k.ad.ge.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Senapati, Naresh (GE Healthcare, consultant) wrote: > Hi, > > Summary of information provided : > > Server A Server B > > Hardware : SOLARIS ZONE Hardware : PROLIANT DL380 G7 > OS: Solaris 10 OS: Red Hat Linux 5.6 > JVM : 6.0.25 JVM: 6.0.30 > Tomcat 6.0.32 Tomcat 6.0.32 > webserver : iplanet 7.15 webserver : iplanet 7.15 > webserver/tomat connector : nsapi redirector webserver/tomat connector : nsapi redirector > rating : "performance is good" rating : "performance has gone down" > > The tomcat code has not been changed. > OK. So now, considering the information above, if there is indeed a perceived performance difference between these configurations, where would your own suspicions lead you ? Without going into much details, you might for example want to make a quick price comparison between the Server B above (in the $1000-$2000 price range ?), and the Server A, and wonder what justifies the price difference ? (Note that as far as I know, "solaris zone" stands for a form of virtualisation, and it is difficult from that information alone to determine what physical resources would be available to Server A, as compared to B). To put this another way, and to get back to your original question : Considering - that the Tomcat code is identical in both cases - that the webserver and (presumably) the nsapi redirector code are similar (same version, but different platform) - that the JVMs used are similar then no, there does not seem to be any a-priori reason why a performance difference might be attributed to these elements. To get any further, you would have to provide a lot more details about what this perceived performance difference really consists of. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andr� Warnier [mailto:aw@ice-sa.com] > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 7:17 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Question > > Senapati, Naresh (GE Healthcare, consultant) wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We have Apache Tomcat 6.0.32 installed for our Trackwise application. It is accessed by web through a iplanet web server which redirects to the tomcat. >> When the webserver was in Solaris the performance was good. We have migrated the webserver to Linux and the performance has gone down. >> >> We would like to know if there is some compatibility concerns with Tomcat 6.0.32 and iplanet 7.15 which may be causing the degradation in performance. >> > > Summary of information provided : > > Server A Server B > > Hardware : ?? Hardware : ?? > OS: Solaris ?? OS: Linux ?? > JVM : ?? JVM: ?? > Tomcat 6.0.32 Tomcat 6.0.32 > webserver : iplanet 7.15 webserver : iplanet 7.15 > webserver/tomat connector : ?? webserver/tomat connector : ?? > rating : "performance is good" rating : "performance has gone down" > > So far, the only real information seems to be that the Tomcat code on both servers is the same. So if there is a difference, it is not there. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org