Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DB9D1095F for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49456 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2014 14:03:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 49160 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2014 14:03:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 49151 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2014 14:03:06 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:03:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO NamePC) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username kpreisser, mechanism login) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:03:05 +0000 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Konstantin_Prei=C3=9Fer?= To: "'Tomcat Users List'" Subject: [OT] RE: Cannot connect from outside using Tomcat 7/APR/SSL on AWS Windows system Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:03:07 +0100 Message-ID: <000f01cf177a$aebb6780$0c323680$@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: Ac8Xef2q5+DeM8AtTYe6kzu6NOxQ+w== Content-Language: de Hi Jeffrey, > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:Jeffrey.Janner@PolyDyne.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:19 PM > Eureka, I finally figured it out! > It was a real eureka moment, some remembrance burned its way up from > my subconscious and I had the answer. > Ready guys? Really surprised no one mentioned it. > It was Windows F-ing Firewall!!!!! Good to hear that you could find and solve the problem. (Off topic:) > I HATE WINDOWS!!!!!! What I can't quite understand is, how one can "hate" Windows or its = "F-ing" firewall, if they just do what they were configured to do... = ;-) When setting up the Windows Firewall, I normally only create rules for = specific (TCP) ports, not for specific executables, so that the firewall = allows connections to a TCP port regardless of what the name or path of = the executable is. Regards, Konstantin Prei=C3=9Fer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org