tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Knoblauch <knobis...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Status of mod_jk-1.2.38
Date Thu, 09 Jan 2014 08:08:02 GMT
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Rainer Jung <rainer.jung@kippdata.de> wrote:

> On 08.01.2014 18:25, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >  happy New year. Should be still early enough for this :-)
> >
> > I have one short question: what is the status of mod_jk-1.2.38? It has
> been
> > over a year since 1.2.37 and I am just curious. I am specially interested
> > in an "official" fix for *Bug
> > 53762*<https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53762>.
> > The patch mentioned there works, but cannot be used due to an "only
> > official releases" policy at the customer site.
>
> I did some more changes lately due to a user request which need some
> more testing. I expect that we'll do the 1.2.38 release during the next
> 4-8 weeks. I have to ask Mladen about the status of his IPv6 changes
> though.
>
>
Cool. Thanks for the info.


> > On a related note: is mod_jk still the preferred way for HA and
> > load-balancing tomcats? Are there better ways? Our environment is
> currently
> > httpd/mod_jk/tomcat on Linux.
>
> Better or worse depend on your requirements. I think mod_jk is still
> working very well and has some unique advantages.
>
>
 OK, good to know. I have no actual issues using mod_jk. It is working well
and does what we need.  Just the release frequency is a bit low, which is
not really a technical thing. But then maybe mod_jk is perfect :-)

 anyway, do you (or someone on the list) happen to know a good
comparison/discussion of the available options?

Cheers
Martin
-- 
------------------------------------------------------
Martin Knoblauch
email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de
www: http://www.knobisoft.de

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message