Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C53CD10EDB for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 23:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50407 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2013 23:06:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 50357 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2013 23:06:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 50343 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2013 23:06:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 23:06:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [209.85.214.177] (HELO mail-ob0-f177.google.com) (209.85.214.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 23:06:32 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id va2so4434004obc.8 for ; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 15:06:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=u/5+63RW3bwQV+1bPU+FnZHVBi3QbHkYDwIBIYfbfko=; b=Kg287aOhUN022pSUtDdi7AWCKdIPR7O3ME4X7te6N0bv8UBQ9ycWfbCAz4gZIE+xN5 jmsGWqSoTqEVxVDtxyOnA9NGikOA//eF3rmpPFfYUrcfN5SBsEMiCB5QQTcYuBtAYq4G KLw3c+/VWpvcvBBxeV6DX9JnjtWu09f8NXYNpaDt3poN7kSmw9UiIj2eo9pGuxc1g5/L V20Y1BY3CMUIBGV575ltj/24ePaBIKFU0QCSfJMUy1VaYj+ZbqkzYETVUiSor1q8fNBw vDkKp8IY34RUQC0g0FFTtXL0qUCUnl89+WMFYX/SbvF/Sgb5FEsNdQ1UErJx4tm6Kk2l DlCw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlQNIsuT0cBud9jpk+eKa5SBSuhvvXIyRd+n5s34FH9PdqV8ykQt2GjgRykBvGIe7yA5IrB X-Received: by 10.60.79.168 with SMTP id k8mr14613201oex.7.1386630371581; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 15:06:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from Jamess-Mac-mini.local (wintouch.touchtonecorp.com. [69.238.233.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id yv10sm18243260obb.12.2013.12.09.15.06.10 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Dec 2013 15:06:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52A64CE0.9080606@touchtonecorp.com> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 15:06:08 -0800 From: "James H. H. Lampert" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: On one particular box, Tomcat 7.0.25 runs just fine, but 7.0.47 crashes on takeoff -- some authority problem References: <52A272D5.3040701@touchtonecorp.com> <52A64980.9020100@christopherschultz.net> In-Reply-To: <52A64980.9020100@christopherschultz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/9/13 2:51 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Can you confirm that qsh is telling you it can't actually run > /foo/tomcat/bin/startup.sh because of a permissions problem, or is it > that /foo/tomcat/bin/startup.sh *is* running and something it's trying > to do is failing? > > Does it fail when running from the command-line, or from some > scheduled job, startup script, etc.? As I recall from Friday, I got the same error message whether I ran it from my STRTOMCAT CL program (which, among other things, finds and selects the best available JVM on the box, and sets up environment variables to avoid the need to set them in catalina.sh or the preferred setenv.sh, before submitting it as a batch job), or from a QShell command line (which is not an especially useful way to run it, given that it would come crashing down around its knees as soon as I exit QShell). But that doesn't tell me anything, one way or the other. And neither does the audit journal entry for the authority problem (it might tell somebody else what was going wrong, but not me). And yet, as I just posted, changing the owner of the entire subtree, something that one would expect (especially given the user profile under which I'm signed on) to either have no effect at all, or to break a working Tomcat, caused it to start working as if nothing had ever been wrong. Which leaves me more puzzled than ever. -- JHHL --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org