tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James H. H. Lampert" <jam...@touchtonecorp.com>
Subject Re: On one particular box, Tomcat 7.0.25 runs just fine, but 7.0.47 crashes on takeoff -- some authority problem
Date Mon, 09 Dec 2013 19:00:08 GMT
On 12/6/13 6:56 PM, CRPence (on the Midrange Java List) wrote:
>The T-AF audit entry should log the object to which there
> was insufficient authority, then the chmod can be requested against that
> object to grant the necessary authority bits.

The T-AF audit entry shows (and I'm no longer bothering to "change names 
to protect the innocent"):

> 00001      'A*N        *N        *STMF    QP0ZSPWP  WTADMIN   '
> 00051      '280199                    WTADMIN             0000'
> 00101      '000                                               '
> 00151      '                                                  '
> 00201      '                                                  '
> 00251      '                         nP8  ry                  '
. . .
> 00801      '   nP8  ry QASP01    00001    USENU  Y            '
> 00851      '      /wintouch/tomcat/bin/startup.sh             '

Which would seem to indicate that it's the startup shell script itself 
that has the authority problem.

So looking at the paths using the QShell "ls" command, I get:

> cd /wintouch/tomcat/bin
> $
> ls -l startup.sh
> -rw-rw-rw-  1 WTADMIN  0                  1961 Oct 18 13:19 startup.sh
for the 7.0.47 version, which has the authority failure, and
> cd /wintouch/tomcat.bak/bin
> $
> ls -l startup.sh
> -rw-rw-rw-  1 WINTOUCH  0                  1961 Jun 15  2012 startup.sh
for the 7.0.25, which looks exactly the same, except for the owner and 
the date, and yet it works.

The bin directory shows:
> drwxrwsrwx  2 WTADMIN  0                 32768 Oct 18 13:19 bin
for 7.0.47 (fails), and
> drwxrwsrwx  2 WINTOUCH  0                 32768 Jun 15  2012 bin
for 7.0.25 (works)

The tomcat (7.0.47) and tomcat.bak (7.0.25) directories show:
> drwxrwsrwx  9 WTADMIN   0                 12288 Dec  6 14:21 tomcat
> drwxrwsrwx  9 WINTOUCH  0                 12288 Jun 15  2012 tomcat.bak

Finally, for comparison, here are the corresponding results on our own 
box, where there are no problems at all:

> drwxrwsrwx   9 RABBIT    0                  8192 Nov 29 16:48 tomcat
> drwxrwsrwx  2 RABBIT  0                 28672 Oct 18 13:19 bin
> -rw-rw-rw-  1 RABBIT  0                  1961 Oct 18 13:19 startup.sh
and
> drwxrwsrwx   9 RABBIT    0                 24576 Nov  5 17:14 tomcat.bak
> drwxrwsrwx  2 RABBIT  0                 28672 Jun 18  2012 bin
> -rw-rw-rw-  1 RABBIT  0                  1961 Feb 14  2012 startup.sh

I don't see any difference

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message