Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dckerber@verizon.net designates
 206.46.173.11 as permitted sender)
Message-id: <5192D101.3000901@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 20:04:17 -0400
From: David Kerber <dckerber@verizon.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328
 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Port still busy after removing connector in Embedded Tomcat
 7.0.30
References: <1368459254.93560.YahooMailNeo@web190701.mail.sg3.yahoo.com>
 <519156F1.5040206@apache.org>
 <1368502452.16159.YahooMailNeo@web190703.mail.sg3.yahoo.com>
 <5192036F.9080000@apache.org>
In-reply-to: <5192036F.9080000@apache.org>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 5/14/2013 5:27 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/05/2013 04:34, Chirag Dewan wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You need to destroy the connector to close the port.
>>
>> Mark,
>>
>> That seems to work. :)
>>
>> Now the port is free. But is it the right approach?
>
> You had a problem you couldn't solve. Someone with an @apache.org e-mail
> address (i.e. an Apache committer and probably a Tomcat committer -
> something you can easily check) provided a solution that worked and you
> are asking if that solution is correct? I am trying very hard not to be
> to be extremely sarcastic right now.

Mark, remember that most people's e-mail clients will only show the 
"friendly" name of the e-mail sender if it's available, not the full 
e-mail address, so he probably didn't see your @Apache.org address.

Those of us who have been participating (or at least lurking) here for a 
while understand that you know pretty much everything there is to know 
about tomcat, but a new poster may not, so I'd give him the benefit of 
the doubt on this.

D


>
>> Is this something we need to do in Tomcat 7 specifically?
>
> There was a lot of lifecycle clean-up in Tomcat 7 including:
> - using the same interface for all components
> - adding JMX registration consistently
> - making sure things were symmetric (what is done in init() is undone in
> destroy(), what is done in start() is undone in stop())
>
> It is likely that binding and unbinding of the port were different in
> Tomcat 6 but I haven't checked svn to confirm this.
>
> Sockets in Tomcat 7 connectors are bound in init() and unbound in
> destroy() by default although you can change this to start() and stop()
> by setting the bindOnInit attribute on the connector to false.
>
> Mark
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org