Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92B60E63B for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:10:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12177 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2013 17:10:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 12020 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2013 17:10:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 12011 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2013 17:10:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:10:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nicholas.williams@ul.com designates 65.55.88.14 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.88.14] (HELO tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com) (65.55.88.14) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:10:18 +0000 Received: from mail18-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.249) by TX2EHSOBE010.bigfish.com (10.9.40.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:09:56 +0000 Received: from mail18-tx2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail18-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823C21E02B8 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:09:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.244.181;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:CH1PRD0410HT003.namprd04.prod.outlook.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -14 X-BigFish: PS-14(zz98dI9371Ie6eI1432Izz1ee6h1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz93eR17326ah8275bhz2fh2a8h668h839h944hd25hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1155h) Received-SPF: pass (mail18-tx2: domain of ul.com designates 157.56.244.181 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.244.181; envelope-from=nicholas.williams@ul.com; helo=CH1PRD0410HT003.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ;.outlook.com ; Received: from mail18-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail18-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1360170594859022_14187; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.246]) by mail18-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA604C008D for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1PRD0410HT003.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (157.56.244.181) by TX2EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (10.9.99.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:09:52 +0000 Received: from CH1PRD0410MB369.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.9.63]) by CH1PRD0410HT003.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.147.38]) with mapi id 14.16.0263.000; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:09:51 +0000 From: "Williams, Nick" To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat Upgrade & Migration Questions Thread-Topic: Tomcat Upgrade & Migration Questions Thread-Index: AQHOBDK0uV6iVpL7fUuMsBmTDOI6gphs5LOAgAApo2A= Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:09:51 +0000 Message-ID: <7CF0788AAB53854AB15567D68F419602382CB8A7@CH1PRD0410MB369.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [67.90.155.66] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: ul.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > On Feb 6, 2013, at 1:24 AM, Kirk Hoganson wrote: >> I am currently in the middle of an upgrade from Apache (2.2)/Tomcat >> (5.5.16) to Apache (2.2)/Tomcat (6.0.24). The JVM is being upgraded >> from >> 1.5.0_09-b01 to 1.6.0_22-b22. The new host servers will be RedHat 6.2. > >Why are you upgrading to 6.0.24 & Java 1.6.0_22? These are already multip= le versions out of date. Do yourself a favor and upgrade to the latest rel= ease of each, which at this time is 6.0.36 and Java 1.6.0_39. Just want to chime in here. Please note that Java 6 is 8 years old, as of F= ebruary 2011 Oracle ended public update notifications, and (most importantl= y) as of February 2013 (this month) Java 6 will be END OF LIFE (http://www.= oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html). This means that if some secur= ity issue is identified in Java 6 that could compromise your servers, the o= nly way you will be able to get a fix for it is to upgrade to Java 7. (Java= 7 is approaching its second birthday and Java 8 comes out later this year.= The plan is for Java 7 to go end of life in July 2014, but July 2012 was t= he plan for Java 6 and that got extended 7 months. I think Java 7 has a lit= tle time left in it yet.) Dan is right to encourage you to go to Java 1.6.0_39 instead of 1.6.0_22 an= d to go to Tomcat 6.0.36 instead of 6.0.24. The versions you are proposing = to update to are out of date, potentially insecure, and should not be used = on production systems. However, I would take it a step further. If you are = already in the process of upgrading your systems, get a little more current= and save yourself some headache down the road. Get Java 1.7.0_13 and Tomca= t 7.0.35. That should last you for a couple more years before you'll need t= o update. Just my $0.02. Nick This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are = not the intended recipient: (1) you may not disclose, use, distribute, copy= or rely upon this message or attachment(s); and (2) please notify the send= er by reply e-mail, and then delete this message and its attachment(s). Und= erwriters Laboratories Inc. and its affiliates disclaim all liability for a= ny errors, omissions, corruption or virus in this message or any attachment= s. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org