Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aw@ice-sa.com designates
 212.85.38.228 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <51079405.1040600@ice-sa.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:19:01 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIFdhcm5pZXI=?= <aw@ice-sa.com>
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: LDAP on TOMCAT 7.0.30
References: <1359346088550-4993107.post@n6.nabble.com>
 <51063F85.1030708@ice-sa.com> <51064FB8.2070904@apache.org>
 <1359368569936-4993116.post@n6.nabble.com>
 <CAG6aRdX7CpAfyKJgMPN32Q20ryC2dNasef=SdQmS_C8E3TE7EA@mail.gmail.com>
 <5106987B.80109@christopherschultz.net> <5106B63D.7090701@ice-sa.com>
 <5106BE7A.3060506@christopherschultz.net>
In-Reply-To: <5106BE7A.3060506@christopherschultz.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Christopher Schultz wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> André,
> 
> On 1/28/13 12:32 PM, André Warnier wrote:
>> Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>> Chris,
>>>
>>> On 1/28/13 7:47 AM, chris derham wrote:
>>>>> 1) All 3 applications  are browser compatible  and users may
>>>>> use other then IE hence IE alone can be ruled out
>>>> Do you mean "multiple browsers access these web applications,
>>>> so we can't use anything that is IE specific"? Assuming that
>>>> you do, I don't believe that anybody suggested anything that is
>>>> IE specific, e.g. the SSO solutions so far posted will work in
>>>> other browsers as well. Can you elaborate on what you mean
>>>> exactly please?
>>> I think auto-forwarding credentials from the client system
>>> through the browser generally requires MSIE. I've never done
>>> anything like that and have no idea what I'm talking about, so I
>>> may be completely wrong.
>>>
>> You are. Firefox supports "Windows Integrated Authentication" fine
>> too, and I believe most usual current browsers do.
> 
> Do you need a plug-in or anything like that? Does it need to be
> specifically enabled?
> 

This may provide more details :
http://markmonica.com/2007/11/20/firefox-and-integrated-windows-authentication/
or search Google for : windows integrated authentication support in firefox

I am using currently Firefox v 17.0.1, and it seems to do fine right out of the box.
By default, Firefox will prompt for id/pw in a dialog box anyway, even for WIA. But you 
can change this specifically for a list of sites, for which no prompt will be issued.
(That's all under Windows of course).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org