Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 515ECE73E for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 01:41:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73972 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2012 01:41:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 73929 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2012 01:41:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 73920 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2012 01:41:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 01:41:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.219.45] (HELO mail-oa0-f45.google.com) (209.85.219.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 01:40:58 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id i18so9145724oag.18 for ; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:40:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=JuNnGbsy18kNec9zGUb/NizYwbAggmOLKb1CyvrutgM=; b=JsASSqI3fzq0NTdHgHSnTq0wzG/W559SP6O+vELw8QDmRy36PlX15boRoPljYS50OZ TR/eHijoerBb2n1Ki4rSQHu5/1BJSj9Om8D0QeKJxG6vOe7ap6TVkmJ3cUIAD89kQ6Dq bbXbzICRgwqme36Kfon/XQci3Eq7oBUXdvTQy6e/enriCsc70ech7OSUFdLTlf3xOHNI MpXFCOSO5wjcRyNKMD+dPh20Em4gvR7N/Yu5q6W9kz6+hpY6Sk7U7JWArqN0xFhsisdM cuIbN8w/fv6hf35iUf6JP68VqM9B4flPjeVRjsPh7xtCBPzE/xsOnvpz+oAbt49OmgEn brNw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.18.142 with SMTP id w14mr2466075obd.65.1354844436236; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:40:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.71.166 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 17:40:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50C12394.9040109@christopherschultz.net> References: <50C12394.9040109@christopherschultz.net> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 20:40:36 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: JDK 1.6 or JDK 1.7 From: Shanti Suresh To: Tomcat Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c823c5909cd04d0394d9d X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmxSvSmJsGTzJERUuYNJiF7qH6v5BmDvV5Y+V/Eg8K9fp801gAwt3JE4Nl/4bi1gQMC6Mvp X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d043c823c5909cd04d0394d9d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Chris, Perfect! Thanks so much. -Shanti On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Christopher Schultz < chris@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Shanti, > > On 12/6/12 2:03 PM, Shanti Suresh wrote: > > I am trying to decide whether to run Tomcat 7.0.33 on JDK 1.6 or > > JDK 1.7. Tomcat-7 release notes say: > > > > Tomcat 7.0 is designed to run on Java SE 6 and later > > > > But I remember reading on this list about some issues folks are > > having with JDK 1.7. Appreciate your advice. > > The first few releases of Java 1.7 had some things that broke a few > things badly. I believe those have all been corrected by now. > > I've been using Oracle Java 1.7.0 64-bit JVM for a while (6 months?) > in development and I have had no problems at all. We have a non-Tomcat > server (Mule ESB) running on OpenJDK 1.7 in another development > environment and that seems to be very stable as well. > > As always, test everything. I dunno how others do it, but I generally > run with a new major version of Java in my own, personal development > environment for about 6 months before we put it into our general > development environments. Then we run in development for a few > test/release cycles before we push it out to demo/production. > > We do the same thing with Tomcat, actually. We're just about to go > into production with Tomcat 7 and probably a few months later, we'll > upgrade to Java 1.7 as well. > > Just in time for Tomcat 8. ;) > > Hope that helps, > - -chris > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iEYEAREIAAYFAlDBI5QACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBm3gCdHfkFwTvsVCioEdxobqWTMApo > rl4AnAnxRqaqP1UsBq/uJTZaaHaSrH0q > =pVuF > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org > > -- Shanti Suresh Application Systems Analyst Lead LSA Development 500 S. State Street Ann Arbor MI 48109-1382 Office: 734-763-4807 shanti@umich.edu --f46d043c823c5909cd04d0394d9d--