Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E522D022 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 06:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16957 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2012 06:58:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 16900 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2012 06:58:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 16891 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2012 06:58:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 06:58:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cchinu@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.173] (HELO mail-ie0-f173.google.com) (209.85.223.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 06:58:41 +0000 Received: by iebc10 with SMTP id c10so584942ieb.18 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 23:58:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=6DyxNlLlbjTi7D0yKWceLqUljjbrmqCTxPzO5u09djU=; b=z0O7bxDnfFOfZdJEtZScSt47BqJMhF0k5rQw3lGsbr7Q1nxQzHSPVh3D2kRoIcksUn c1bpCFmQLY4Ojq4q0rWbw+GhQ8NcmMv3AyFLmbPRDn0ua+WknqteG6inHpVI/dteEIW9 So6DzaCVKQjRK0BaTybyxy9MfkITDij32y88cMCI5SGZTe0voiEXWdkKNY2KtM0khQwb TdzcwpNqr5wfbpmhzuYRFUwxSwsUAtczdHwVkqtyzGRXUahHLyaXE80oG2IDAi0IG7Xw LVOms4ZHf56JMf7CxzIxIFRJYyAbNMU3/niMCYhp6SLmybP2/GrAwvMQT5rvxXbqbRo7 +Nvg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.13.71 with SMTP id f7mr17174499oec.43.1346828300977; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 23:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.32.166 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 23:58:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:28:20 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Facing Memory leak - 64 bit Tomcat 6.0.35 with windows 2008 R2(64 bit JVM 1.6.0_33) From: Chinmoy Chakraborty To: Tomcat Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb201d074049704c8eee62e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8fb201d074049704c8eee62e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 What's the maximum heap size allocated to the JVM in both cases? you can try increasing the same where you are getting OME. you can set the heap size like this: -Xms 512m -Xmx 1024m Chinmoy On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Shailendra Singh wrote: > Hi, > > We are using 64 bit Tomcat 6.0.35 with windows 2008 R2 (64 bit JVM > 1.6.0_33) and facing memory leak issues(OutOfMemoryError ) after a short > interval of time( ~30 minutes). > > We deploy a web application on this version of tomcat and while working > with the GUI part of the application we face memory leak, but same > application works fine on this windows server for 32 bit JVM. > > Please help us if this is an issue with 64 bit Tomcat version or with > 64bit JVM or with its combination. > kindly let us know a solution or any work around or for this. > > Thanks and Regards, > Shailendra Singh > > > > ________________________________ > > --e89a8fb201d074049704c8eee62e--