Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 960D0D6CC for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 23:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32450 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2012 23:41:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 32361 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2012 23:41:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 32351 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2012 23:41:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 23:41:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dckerber@verizon.net designates 206.46.173.1 as permitted sender) Received: from [206.46.173.1] (HELO vms173001pub.verizon.net) (206.46.173.1) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 23:41:12 +0000 Received: from [192.168.11.4] ([unknown] [96.233.132.234]) by vms173001.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0M9W00EUFHRJLQY5@vms173001.mailsrvcs.net> for users@tomcat.apache.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 18:40:32 -0500 (CDT) Message-id: <5047E2EA.4030707@verizon.net> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:40:26 -0400 From: David Kerber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: [OT] Facing Memory leak - 64 bit Tomcat 6.0.35 with windows 2008 R2(64 bit JVM 1.6.0_33) References: ,, <50476C05.6030308@christopherschultz.net>, , <1346865475.2513.1428.camel@dellberry>, <50479783.5040903@christopherschultz.net>, , <5047AB65.6060901@verizon.net> <5047D0B5.6040406@christopherschultz.net> In-reply-to: <5047D0B5.6040406@christopherschultz.net> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Ok. You've dealt with it a lot more than I have. I had thought we started with it in the late 90's, but I guess I might be wrong on that; I didn't go back and look anything up. The transaction and restart stats are accurate, though... On 9/5/2012 6:22 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > David, > > On 9/5/12 3:43 PM, David kerber wrote: >> On 9/5/2012 3:29 PM, PJ Delsh wrote: >>> Chris and Tim, When we had Tomcat issues, every Tomcat >>> professional we spoke to told us to drop Windows and move to >>> Linux ASAP. We were told that Tomcat is more stable and less >>> sensitive on Linux, and there are far better troubleshooting >>> tools on Linux than there are for Windows. If this is inaccurate, >>> then Tomcat consulting companies are spreading misinformation. >>> -PJ >> >> They're not spreading misinfomation, they're just pushing people >> to where they want them to go for their own purposes. We have been >> running TC apps on windows for about 15 years (since TC 4.x), with >> some of them taking more than 4 million transactions per day (up to >> 100 per second during peak times), and go months between restarts. >> And even then, those restarts are just for windows security >> updates. > > 15 years is a stretch even for TC4. In 1999, Sun donated the code to > the ASF which was merged with the existing Apache JServ product. The > name "Apache Tomcat" didn't exist until the donation of code from Sun. > > 15 years ago (1997), it was called Apache JServ and it was very > immature. It took until 1999 for it to be released as 1.0. I remember > helping evaluate Apache JServ versus Sun's Servlet Server (can't > remember what it was called at the time -- definitely not "Tomcat") > and coming to the conclusion that JServ was unstable and non-compliant > (and a pain to set up, because it required a web server in front!). > > - -chris > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlBH0LUACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDXtQCfWBnGkOy3BMXPwn4++Xa63f10 > jrMAnj3hB1PIZJgVgF8z72n40P8XcZyu > =Scv8 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org