tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Mikusa <dmik...@vmware.com>
Subject Re: mod_jk vs. mod_proxy
Date Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:10:08 GMT
On Sep 18, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Shanti Suresh wrote:

> All,
> 
> I wanted your opinion on this topic.  I was heavily into using "mod_jk" a
> few years back.  But I have since started using mod_proxy for the following
> reasons:
> (1) mod_proxy is easier to configure
> (2) I remember reading that "mod_jk" is deprecated

I've not heard this.  Where did you read this?

> (3) Logging for mod_proxy appears inline with Apache traffic log entries
> and is easier to debug.  I am able to get detailed logging from mod_proxy
> by adjusting Apache's "LogLevel to debug".
> (4) Could there be any other reasons that I might be missing?

I found this article helpful.

http://www.tomcatexpert.com/blog/2010/06/16/deciding-between-modjk-modproxyhttp-and-modproxyajp

Dan


> I do also like the separate logging that mod_jk gives though.  I notice
> that mod_jk is still being used.  I just wanted to know your opinion.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>                       -Shanti


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message