Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11B73D441 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 20:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30497 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2012 20:18:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 30274 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2012 20:18:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 30265 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2012 20:18:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 20:18:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.12.242.42] (HELO smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) (80.12.242.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 20:18:42 +0000 Received: from mail.homeinbox.net ([2.24.222.242]) by mwinf5d20 with ME id eLJL1j0015EQ4qA03LJLsj; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:18:20 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CA6EAB757 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:18:20 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at homeinbox.net Received: from mail.homeinbox.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.homeinbox.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QfCjU8YL81Vy for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:18:11 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.4.16] (net203-139-173.mclink.it [213.203.139.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB3F1EAB755 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:18:10 +0100 (BST) References: <500EAD13.1010308@christopherschultz.net> <500EC9DF.6000508@apache.org> <500EEB10.8070806@christopherschultz.net> User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <500EEB10.8070806@christopherschultz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Tomcat and "JDK Compatibility" From: Mark Thomas Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:17:55 +0200 To: Tomcat Users List Message-ID: <7ebcfe2a-70cf-470a-b894-b1e97c1093a9@email.android.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Christopher Schultz wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Mark, > >On 7/24/12 12:14 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 24/07/2012 16:11, Christopher Schultz wrote: >>> All, >> >>> The Tomcat documentation says somewhat tangentially that Tomcat >>> requires a JDK (instead of a JRE). I believe this has not been >>> true for quite some time. >> >>> Check the very first "requirement" for installation on these >>> pages: >> >>> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/appdev/installation.html >>> >>> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/appdev/installation.html >> >>> Is there any reason not to change "JDK" to "JRE" (and probably >>> mention that a JDK in fact contains a JRE)? >> >> Yes. That is the application development section for which a JDK >> is required. > >Surely a (simple) web application can be developed without a JDK, >right? If you work entirely in JSP (a nightmare scenario IMO), then >you don't need a JDK. > >I'm asking because these pages (specifically) have been used to >justify the rumor that Tomcat requires (or even prefers) the JDK to >the JRE. Honestly, when I read it, I was surprised to see that it said >JDK even though that page is, as you say, just for application >development. It's obvious to me that, though the page mentions CVS, it >is certainly not required to develop (nor deploy) web applications for >use on Tomcat. The same can be said for JDK versus JRE. > >Do you think there would be any objections to clarifying this point on >that page? I'd be happy to provide a documentation patch. > >- -chris >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) >Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org >Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > >iEYEARECAAYFAlAO6xAACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PAZsgCgl9YfIqdJu7NxgIrbmLkli74b >LuoAn21yQPP95NwzKWeTp60R8P5U48Zv >=KD3J >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org Clarify away. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org