Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E005596A7 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2535 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2012 13:26:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 22353 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2012 13:20:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 60772 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2012 08:38:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:38:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aw@ice-sa.com designates 212.85.38.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [212.85.38.228] (HELO tor.combios.es) (212.85.38.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:38:49 +0000 Received: from [192.168.245.129] (p549E8E10.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.158.142.16]) by tor.combios.es (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 06BA3DA06B5 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 10:38:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <501101FE.2040806@ice-sa.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 10:38:22 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andr=E9_Warnier?= Reply-To: Tomcat Users List User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: issue with iis 7.5 ajpconnector References: <500E4B42.2060205@ice-sa.com><501004C7.30201@kippdata.de> <5010673E.6070201@kippdata.de> In-Reply-To: <5010673E.6070201@kippdata.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Rainer Jung wrote: > On 25.07.2012 22:40, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote: >> Oh so your saying there was an issue that has been fixed since then .. >> >> Okay I get the drill. I had just presumed that there had been no >> changes since then on the mutex code that ... >> Any way ... >> >> Back once I run up a test box... with the latest release version > > I'm not pretending that your problems will be fixed by a newer version > but analyzing a problem on the basis of a non-released (broken) version > seems inefficient. Thanks for updating. > Without rubbing it in too forcefully, this is exactly the reason why it is important to provide precise technical details right from the start. The people on this list are trying to be helpful, and they do this for fun. At the same time, it is a bit frustrating spending time to exchange multiple messages back and forth, to end up realising that we may be talking about some unknown or broken or unsupported piece of software (or hardware, as the case may be). It just wastes time for everyone, and also delays the eventual resolution of your problem. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org