Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A6879DD91 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:19:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59016 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2012 16:19:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 58829 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2012 16:19:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 58818 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2012 16:19:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:19:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.64] (HELO qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.64) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:19:29 +0000 Received: from omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.27]) by qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id YcaQ1j0010bG4ec57gKAki; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:19:10 +0000 Received: from Christophers-MacBook-Pro.local ([107.3.88.58]) by omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id YgK91j00B1FXhpX3PgK9MR; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:19:10 +0000 Message-ID: <4FFC55FC.7010308@christopherschultz.net> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:19:08 -0400 From: Christopher Schultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: General Architecture Question for multiple websites on a single RedHat server References: <4FF4E79B.20203@christopherschultz.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Simon, On 7/9/12 4:24 PM, Simon, Leonard wrote: > Well our Tomcat went out to lunch again and we had to recycle the > webserver to get things stablized. By this I mean we get reports > from the users that screens become unresponsive and looking at a > top we see tomcat process taking 100% CPU. Are you sure this is the right process? > Was able to do a thread dump captured with a kill -3 PID and here > it is if anyone is so inclined to comment on it. This thread dump shows a mostly-idle server with the exception of those threads in socketAccept() (not sure why these count as RUNNABLE when they are really blocking) and those executing reads from the client connection(s). What exact version of Tomcat are you using, and what version of mod_jk (or, if you are using mox_proxy_ajp, what httpd version)? IIRC, there have been some stability improvements in recent Tomcat versions around the worker threads being returned to their associated connectors. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/8VfwACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PCgWwCfbN/E29q4DKee4q1A+IEMmED6 8+0AnivucFDMS/7lhPiOb+0tv5I/6vim =ABXf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org