Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85FEE908D for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 06:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21593 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2012 06:26:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 20963 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2012 06:26:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 19951 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2012 06:26:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 06:26:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of knobisoft@googlemail.com designates 209.85.214.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.173] (HELO mail-ob0-f173.google.com) (209.85.214.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 06:26:02 +0000 Received: by obbwd20 with SMTP id wd20so10918820obb.18 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:25:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=pTGxHuQg6X3Uk+fDyaLRO+zUc7ZmPkzwCmiFsGAVZ7Q=; b=pAixnMyXRqAIT63vqoq4mZz6g8pyI6E3+RAEeBHXIiAM8Osq4laZkJ0+K4XfPWn7kE wXcFjf49iTQ67oSLURMeHLnrLMBxzrPym2zizwJoUCzVBR2N5tbQ8BAEZ7i1CRcgt8pV ERlNqOZp1zg0RD/AL8yaMhqketbC14vY0yAovKf6YBDrSz7YaPtr9kcfJALgDi9C6B8C cT78NrBxXhhVP8wEqkMTnioS+q5RVkkOyBSJ3Skbf4dPlqM7H9Ov0qgBEmnEy8z3KufK 44x14edkkr5TsLDYiE/nWHG44B6wCrSVjA0prvERwnC+5yL4rm54FOpBRxDHtEhGjvrm u4NQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.4.165 with SMTP id l5mr18966660oel.41.1339482341256; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.17.169 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:25:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <99C8B2929B39C24493377AC7A121E21FB02937F629@USEA-EXCH8.na.uis.unisys.com> References: <99C8B2929B39C24493377AC7A121E21FB02931FA4B@USEA-EXCH8.na.uis.unisys.com> <99C8B2929B39C24493377AC7A121E21FB02937F629@USEA-EXCH8.na.uis.unisys.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:25:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Tomcat uses 99% of CPU - Something to do with AJP connector From: Martin Knoblauch To: Tomcat Users List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:knobisoft@googlemail.com] >> Subject: Re: Tomcat uses 99% of CPU - Something to do with AJP connector > >> From a technical point of view - yes. But from experience I can tell >> that you there are IT organisations out there that have really weird >> policies. So "upgrade middleware only once a year" is not unthinkable > > I didn't say (or imply) that it was unthinkable - just stupid. > What I wanted to say is that the original poster may not have full control over the environment s/he is working in. Cheers Martin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org