tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pid <...@pidster.com>
Subject Re: Slow downloads through mod_jk on Windows XP
Date Wed, 09 May 2012 18:55:30 GMT
On 08/05/2012 22:13, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Andy Wang [mailto:awang@ptc.com] 
>> Subject: Re: Slow downloads through mod_jk on Windows XP
> 
>> Downloading a large file through mod_jk to tomcat looks like this:
>> 2012-05-08 16:01:22 (15.0 MB/s) - "sol-11-1111-text-x86.iso.8" saved 
>> [450799616/450799616]
> 
>> Downloading the same large file directly through apache looks like:
>> 2012-05-08 16:01:58 (19.3 MB/s) - "sol-11-1111-text-x86.iso.11" saved 
>> [450799616/450799616]
> 
>> So apache still beats tomcat by a good chunk
> 
> No, httpd (not Apache, which is an open source software organization) beats httpd+Tomcat
- any other result would be violating several laws of physics.  Might be interesting to measure
just Tomcat in your environment.

But preferably a supported non-ancient version of Tomcat.


p

>  - Chuck
> 
> 
> THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and
is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact
the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
> 


-- 

[key:62590808]


Mime
View raw message