Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F9599739 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 04:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66358 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2012 04:32:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 66146 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2012 04:32:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 66121 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2012 04:32:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 04:32:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of josh.gooding@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.45] (HELO mail-vw0-f45.google.com) (209.85.212.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 04:32:21 +0000 Received: by vbal1 with SMTP id l1so4552364vba.18 for ; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:32:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=1kRZb60+yCWqKWrxIM2Uerly7u4LtbUm8H1FqAGtFuA=; b=rOJ9YHydnP2XMzXXTXPeDrHUAshFtsElPyhsZK83EDRFG5sBYqVnnsb5p5flomGAEK 5+B+sxwpCf1M23HkdFgV1zcde8b1J4AIN6x9L3I0LVOF6WMk/EJb7DifxpuSSGWiQTcS cAXEBr0QgGbNdvloz5pfbwurEF1nMXofudVy4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.71.80 with SMTP id s16mr6973558vdu.131.1328502720430; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:32:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.182.102 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 20:32:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <99C8B2929B39C24493377AC7A121E21FB011122C01@USEA-EXCH8.na.uis.unisys.com> References: <004001cce482$517b2c90$f47185b0$@com> <99C8B2929B39C24493377AC7A121E21FB011122C01@USEA-EXCH8.na.uis.unisys.com> Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 23:32:00 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: unable to set MaxPermSize past 128MB From: Josh Gooding To: Tomcat Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3071d0d6bc02ad04b84424b8 --20cf3071d0d6bc02ad04b84424b8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 your kidding me right? Why is tweaking the JVM for this so hard? On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Caldarale, Charles R < Chuck.Caldarale@unisys.com> wrote: > > From: David Dabbs [mailto:dmdabbs@gmail.com] > > Subject: RE: unable to set MaxPermSize past 128MB > > > > I just upgraded to 6.0.35 running on Win2K3 32 bit platform. > > > I believe you need to specify > > -XX:MaxPermSize=256m > > and not > > -XX:MaxPermSize:256m > > Even when the OP gets the syntax right, it's extremely unlikely that the > stated combination of heap and PermGen size will be available on a 32-bit > Windows platform. The sum of -Xmx and MaxPermSize, plus code, stacks, > non-Java heap, etc., must all fit within the virtual space of the process, > which is normally 2 MB. The values will have to be experimented with to > find exactly what will work and what won't. The total available space will > also vary with the exact JVM version and sometimes even which patches have > been applied to Windows. > > - Chuck > > > THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY > MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you > received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and > its attachments from all computers. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org > > --20cf3071d0d6bc02ad04b84424b8--