tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David kerber <dcker...@verizon.net>
Subject Re: [OT] Re: Regarding compatibility
Date Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:57:53 GMT
On 2/3/2012 6:12 AM, Pid wrote:
> On 03/02/2012 07:55, André Warnier wrote:
>> Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>>> From: David Kerber [mailto:dckerber@verizon.net] Subject: Re:
>>>> Regarding compatibility
>>>
>>>>>> It will be open source, right?
>>>
>>>>> Both open *and* closed source.
>>>
>>>> But you won't know which until you download it and open the package...
>>>
>>> Furry source...
>>>
>>> Are we all going to be entangled in this?
>>>
>> Mmm, that's an interesting thought.  The DarkEnergy compiler should be
>> entangling.  This way, any modification to the source will be
>> instantantly reflected in the object code (and all its copies), wherever
>> they are. No more updates to download, every installation forever
>> up-to-date etc. Think of the savings in bandwidth.
>> Makes the revision process a bit tricky though.
>> And need a disentangling backup utility.
>
> Like it.

+1

>
> DarkEnergy[TM] compiles to bytecode presumably?  Seems everyone&  their
> dog is inventing JVM languages, no reason why we can't.  QLG is a hard
> problem to solve, so I'd expect the syntax to be more complex, than say,
> Scala.
>
>
> p
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message