tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pid <...@pidster.com>
Subject [OT] Re: Regarding compatibility
Date Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:12:51 GMT
On 03/02/2012 07:55, André Warnier wrote:
> Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>> From: David Kerber [mailto:dckerber@verizon.net] Subject: Re:
>>> Regarding compatibility
>>
>>>>> It will be open source, right?
>>
>>>> Both open *and* closed source.
>>
>>> But you won't know which until you download it and open the package...
>>
>> Furry source...
>>
>> Are we all going to be entangled in this?
>>
> Mmm, that's an interesting thought.  The DarkEnergy compiler should be
> entangling.  This way, any modification to the source will be
> instantantly reflected in the object code (and all its copies), wherever
> they are. No more updates to download, every installation forever
> up-to-date etc. Think of the savings in bandwidth.
> Makes the revision process a bit tricky though.
> And need a disentangling backup utility.

Like it.

DarkEnergy[TM] compiles to bytecode presumably?  Seems everyone & their
dog is inventing JVM languages, no reason why we can't.  QLG is a hard
problem to solve, so I'd expect the syntax to be more complex, than say,
Scala.


p


-- 

[key:62590808]


Mime
View raw message