Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D95C7A0E for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2011 21:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64931 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2011 21:50:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 64713 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2011 21:50:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 64704 invoked by uid 99); 3 Dec 2011 21:50:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:50:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aw@ice-sa.com designates 212.85.38.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [212.85.38.228] (HELO tor.combios.es) (212.85.38.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:50:31 +0000 Received: from [192.168.245.129] (p549E0F39.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.158.15.57]) by tor.combios.es (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3D41EDA0341 for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2011 22:50:08 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4EDA9991.3040307@ice-sa.com> Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 22:50:09 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIFdhcm5pZXI=?= Reply-To: Tomcat Users List User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Do any of the Tomcat LDAP-type realms support "no password" authentication? References: <20111203162127.P1NHD.207093.imail@eastrmwml106> In-Reply-To: <20111203162127.P1NHD.207093.imail@eastrmwml106> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ohaya@cox.net wrote: > ---- "André Warnier" wrote: >> ohaya@cox.net wrote: >>>> Now let me ask another question : >>>> Why do you need to authenticate the user at the Apache level, and pass this user-id to >>>> Tomcat ? >>>> Obviously, from the OAM documentation I scanned, there must exist an OAM module directly >>>> for Tomcat, to authenticate users there. Why are you not using that ? >>> >>> It seems like they should have one, but, unfortunately, they don't. >>> >> Mmm. Browsing the documentation, I seem to remember seeing something about Weblogic, no ? >> Is that not usable ? >> >> (As an aside, send your messages only to the list. I get all messages to the list anyway, >> so if you send them to me too, I get them twice). > > > Hi, > > Sorry about the emails. > > Yes, they do support integrating with WebLogic, and we do use that for other cases, but that's probably a bit off-topic here. > We don't mind the competition here. Keeps us on our toes. Just kidding. What I meant to ask (me being the not-so-Java specialist see) was, since Weblogic is a servlet engine, and Tomcat is a servlet engine, both ought to abide by the servlet spec and such, so isn't the Weblogic-oriented module usable with Tomcat ? Or is this too much of a rosy view of the world ? Anyway, the only other thing that comes to mind is, since you seem to be an OAM customer, can you not ask the OAM support people if OAM sets the internal Apache user-id or not ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org