Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC6FC7F1E for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2011 21:21:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44063 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2011 21:21:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 43901 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2011 21:21:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 43892 invoked by uid 99); 3 Dec 2011 21:21:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:21:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=5.0 tests=FH_FAKE_RCVD_LINE_B,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ohaya@cox.net designates 68.230.241.213 as permitted sender) Received: from [68.230.241.213] (HELO eastrmfepo101.cox.net) (68.230.241.213) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:21:48 +0000 Received: from eastrmimpo306.cox.net ([68.230.241.238]) by eastrmfepo101.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20111203212128.NXLD24648.eastrmfepo101.cox.net@eastrmimpo306.cox.net> for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2011 16:21:28 -0500 Received: from eastrmwml106 ([172.18.18.217]) by eastrmimpo306.cox.net with bizsmtp id 4lMT1i00G4h0NJL02lMTtF; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 16:21:27 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020203.4EDA92D7.00F0,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=cdJjHAINPiZBdT+VAeFfLOvj93neuvwrRIGsWSZO+Cw= c=1 sm=1 a=oDu9JGl69GgA:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=HmblazRPy8UA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=t1PrUrtrk04foxyHgvPcUw==:17 a=kGNjuPkcAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=GBAn593uUL2RX_DGqWIA:9 a=SMuNWWs7mYNC3DQduM8A:7 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=aaYDVmB8Po4A:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=t1PrUrtrk04foxyHgvPcUw==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from 72.205.21.101 by webmail.east.cox.net; Sat, 3 Dec 2011 16:21:27 -0500 Message-ID: <20111203162127.P1NHD.207093.imail@eastrmwml106> Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 16:21:27 -0500 From: To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Do any of the Tomcat LDAP-type realms support "no password" authentication? In-Reply-To: <4EDA8D65.3090301@ice-sa.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sensitivity: Normal ---- "Andr=C3=A9 Warnier" wrote:=20 > ohaya@cox.net wrote: > >> Now let me ask another question : > >> Why do you need to authenticate the user at the Apache level, and pass= this user-id to=20 > >> Tomcat ? > >> Obviously, from the OAM documentation I scanned, there must exist an O= AM module directly=20 > >> for Tomcat, to authenticate users there. Why are you not using that ? > >=20 > >=20 > > It seems like they should have one, but, unfortunately, they don't. > >=20 > Mmm. Browsing the documentation, I seem to remember seeing something abou= t Weblogic, no ? > Is that not usable ? >=20 > (As an aside, send your messages only to the list. I get all messages to = the list anyway,=20 > so if you send them to me too, I get them twice). Hi, Sorry about the emails. =20 Yes, they do support integrating with WebLogic, and we do use that for othe= r cases, but that's probably a bit off-topic here. Jim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org