Return-Path: 
 <users-return-228228-apmail-tomcat-users-archive=tomcat.apache.org@tomcat.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 574759327
	for <apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Wed,  5 Oct 2011 22:17:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 1172 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2011 22:17:36 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org
Received: (qmail 992 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2011 22:17:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.tomcat.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org
Received: (qmail 981 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2011 22:17:36 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:17:36 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of appy74@dsl.pipex.com designates
 212.74.114.14 as permitted sender)
Received: from [212.74.114.14] (HELO mk-outboundfilter-6.mail.uk.tiscali.com)
 (212.74.114.14)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:17:28 +0000
X-Trace: 
 372409930/mk-outboundfilter-6.mail.uk.tiscali.com/PIPEX/$PIPEX-ACCEPTED/pipex-customers/81.86.114.41/None/appy74@dsl.pipex.com
X-SBRS: None
X-RemoteIP: 81.86.114.41
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: appy74@dsl.pipex.com
X-SMTP-AUTH: 
X-Originating-Country: GB/UNITED KINGDOM
X-MUA: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: 
 AgEFAPzWjE5RVnIp/2dsb2JhbABChG2jLIEGgVMBAQUIAhkFJggvAQMCBgMRBAEBAQICEgEQAwICGRgIDQkIAgQIBwQBCgUNBIdepRKRUIEtgmoBgX2BFASZAogHhCk
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,494,1312153200";
   d="scan'208";a="372409930"
X-IP-Direction: IN
Received: from 81-86-114-41.dsl.pipex.com (HELO Ustane) ([81.86.114.41])
  by smtp.pipex.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 05 Oct 2011 23:17:07 +0100
From: "Martin O'Shea" <appy74@dsl.pipex.com>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
References: <1317746617.4e8b37b9f03d5@netmail.pipex.net>
 <99C8B2929B39C24493377AC7A121E21FB0038543D8@USEA-EXCH8.na.uis.unisys.com>
 <1317748330.4e8b3e6aefdcb@netmail.pipex.net>
 <4E8B46DA.6020605@christopherschultz.net> <4E8B4A01.4080709@ice-sa.com>
 <1317751568.4e8b4b103edd5@netmail.pipex.net> <4E8B56D0.7030506@ice-sa.com>
 <00a301cc8375$32988390$97c98ab0$@dsl.pipex.com>
 <4E8C9646.3030703@christopherschultz.net>
 <00ac01cc8388$94c6a8e0$be53faa0$@dsl.pipex.com>
 <4E8CC721.4080509@christopherschultz.net>
 <00b301cc83ab$0876a020$1963e060$@dsl.pipex.com>
 <4E8CD674.8050802@christopherschultz.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E8CD674.8050802@christopherschultz.net>
Subject: RE: Using multiple login pages
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 23:17:07 +0100
Message-ID: <00b401cc83ac$84f62840$8ee278c0$@dsl.pipex.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: 
 AQE0g4/R1ojm70ppBm5oJVQqETk4LQH6gidqAlmmnr0B1jZ2DAJJiCaiAkqwA7cCD7nv7ALPbohXAiQoMw4DA9oi4QMCSeh6AxGK9EkCHCw16ZW2o5Mg
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

That's a shame. It looked promising.

I wouldn't mind seeing a servlet specified as <form-login-page> if you =
know of an example.

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:chris@christopherschultz.net]=20
Sent: 05 Oct 2011 23 13
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Using multiple login pages

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Martin,

On 10/5/2011 6:06 PM, Martin O'Shea wrote:
> Thanks for this Chris. It is food for thought.
>=20
> I was under the impression that <form-login-page> was static, because=20
> that's how I seen it used in apps I've worked on.
>=20
> But I am curious to try a filter as well, something like this mapped=20
> to the login:

That's not going to work: the authentication stuff happens before your =
Filter can get it's hands on the request.

- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk6M1nQACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PAbvQCgsXcZD/J1FWCKl/LzuQOCEXr0
0qgAoJgNHrsZoD03AvFcDw0J6Euqaz3s
=3Dpy59
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org