Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E126F8551 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 22:26:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1123 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2011 22:25:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 864 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2011 22:25:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 855 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2011 22:25:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 22:25:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of parapontisj@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.45] (HELO mail-fx0-f45.google.com) (209.85.161.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 22:25:49 +0000 Received: by fxbb27 with SMTP id b27so3536007fxb.18 for ; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 15:25:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ES+OuyjIG77nZfx8ZYE3quTe/yf8px4tZo/mx5kgXOA=; b=v1z1DIZOr/Xfs28/DgEwM4tnqsFKtWTTGONA7vatvNRI7FORN6vx7oSnrgJ8UDwDLQ mwleniAqCcpReH+wyuMt/tqrdU8wRv58cqzRUn3PIje3MWsPOZAuFvDLuVPYIsUbO6Rx rKowf/nZbkMdyYc/iEhGsJrdXpzjJFnIrUCC4= Received: by 10.223.44.8 with SMTP id y8mr2195814fae.129.1315088728283; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 15:25:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.7] (78-73-114.adsl.cyta.gr [78.87.73.114]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k28sm1964573faf.21.2011.09.03.15.25.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 03 Sep 2011 15:25:27 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Virtual hosts on Tomcat 7 for 3 webapps References: From: Ioannis Parapontis Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8L1) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 01:25:27 +0300 To: Tomcat Users List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8L1) Thanks for the responses. The reason i do not use apache is that the server= that runs my 3 apps works better with Tomcat. So it would be useful if some= guidelines are provided on how i should do this. Sent from my iPhone On 4 =CE=A3=CE=B5=CF=80 2011, at 1:01, Manuel Fern=C3=A1ndez Panzuela wrote: > why you don't use virtualhost over apache ? >=20 > it's easier do it with it. >=20 > Un saludo >=20 >=20 >=20 > 2011/9/3 Ioannis Parapontis >=20 >> Hi there >>=20 >> I have a server that runs 3 different web apps on the same ip but each on= >> its own port. eg ip:8080, ip:8081 and ip:8082. All apps should run >> simultaneously and have their own folders. Can a single Tomcat support t= he >> 3 of them and can i use virtual hosts on Tomcat alone ? >>=20 >> Thanks >>=20 >> Sent from my iPhone >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org >>=20 >>=20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org